-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
Add dfn of Decentralized Identifer Registry #184
Conversation
index.html
Outdated
failure. In combination, DLTs and decentralized identity systems | ||
enable any entity to create and manage their own identifiers on any | ||
number of distributed, independent roots of trust. | ||
Globally distributed ledgers, decentralized P2P networks, and other systems |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rip out changes in lines 209-250 and put it in another PR -- it's going to make an otherwise non-controversial PR, controversial. That, or we'll have to wait for the discussion around the change to the abstract/intro to settle before pulling this in. If we don't have changes to 209-250, it's a fairly easy editorial change. (Note: I might have missed something on the last call that made this change acceptable by the group w/o discussion).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mm okay I have reverted these and we can work on the overview section more separately
I think this PR is good to go, @talltree and @peacekeeper can one of you two review this so we can get it into the spec. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There has been some discussion in the past around using the term "registry" for DIDs (e.g. see here). Traditional "registries" are all centralized and imply a dependent relationship with "registrants". But since it's explicitly called DIR now, I think that's good!
I am good with this PR. |
I'm okay with this too.
…On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:39 PM Markus Sabadello ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In terms.html
<#184 (comment)>:
> @@ -43,6 +43,14 @@
System</a>, and most national ID systems.
</dd>
+ <dt><dfn data-lt="DIR|decentralized identifier registry|decentralized identifier registries">Decentralized Identifier Registry</dfn> (DIR)</dt>
+
+ <dd>
+A role a system performs to mediate the creation, verification, updating, and
Okay nevermind, sounds good.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#184 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADLkTQ3R1VZlabMPHgb5tKCNpJuFr3gsks5vfBl6gaJpZM4cT2rX>
.
|
Merging per decision in 2019-05-09 DID Spec and DID Resolution Spec meeting. Note: This is being merged primarily so we have a unified term ("Decentralized Identifier Registry") everywhere across the spec. The final term could still be changed via search&replace in a subsequent PR if desired; for example, the term "DID network" has also been proposed. |
Use 'Decentralized Identifier Registry' (a type of Verifiable Data Registry) instead of "target system", "ledger" and "distributed ledger". Some references to "distributed ledger" remain but not in direct reference to DIDs, just in explanatory text.
(DIR was discussed at RWOT8.)
This should address #119, #149 and #150
Preview | Diff