Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 29, 2019. It is now read-only.

Add dfn of Decentralized Identifer Registry #184

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 10, 2019

Conversation

rhiaro
Copy link
Member

@rhiaro rhiaro commented Mar 30, 2019

Use 'Decentralized Identifier Registry' (a type of Verifiable Data Registry) instead of "target system", "ledger" and "distributed ledger". Some references to "distributed ledger" remain but not in direct reference to DIDs, just in explanatory text.

(DIR was discussed at RWOT8.)

This should address #119, #149 and #150


Preview | Diff

@rhiaro rhiaro added the clarify There is consensus, but the spec needs clarifying label Mar 30, 2019
@rhiaro rhiaro requested a review from msporny March 30, 2019 17:16
@rhiaro rhiaro requested a review from jandrieu March 30, 2019 17:19
index.html Outdated
failure. In combination, DLTs and decentralized identity systems
enable any entity to create and manage their own identifiers on any
number of distributed, independent roots of trust.
Globally distributed ledgers, decentralized P2P networks, and other systems
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would rip out changes in lines 209-250 and put it in another PR -- it's going to make an otherwise non-controversial PR, controversial. That, or we'll have to wait for the discussion around the change to the abstract/intro to settle before pulling this in. If we don't have changes to 209-250, it's a fairly easy editorial change. (Note: I might have missed something on the last call that made this change acceptable by the group w/o discussion).

Copy link
Member Author

@rhiaro rhiaro Mar 31, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mm okay I have reverted these and we can work on the overview section more separately

@msporny
Copy link
Contributor

msporny commented Mar 31, 2019

I think this PR is good to go, @talltree and @peacekeeper can one of you two review this so we can get it into the spec.

Copy link
Member

@peacekeeper peacekeeper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There has been some discussion in the past around using the term "registry" for DIDs (e.g. see here). Traditional "registries" are all centralized and imply a dependent relationship with "registrants". But since it's explicitly called DIR now, I think that's good!

terms.html Show resolved Hide resolved
@talltree
Copy link
Contributor

talltree commented Apr 9, 2019

I am good with this PR.

@talltree
Copy link
Contributor

talltree commented Apr 9, 2019 via email

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Member

Merging per decision in 2019-05-09 DID Spec and DID Resolution Spec meeting.

Note: This is being merged primarily so we have a unified term ("Decentralized Identifier Registry") everywhere across the spec. The final term could still be changed via search&replace in a subsequent PR if desired; for example, the term "DID network" has also been proposed.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
clarify There is consensus, but the spec needs clarifying
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants