[css-text-4] Drop keyword and mark an open issue, since there's no co…

…nsensus on what syntax is or isn't necessary for good text-wrapping algorithms. #672

css-text-4/Overview.bs

@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ Text Wrap Settings: the 'text-wrap' property</h3>
 
 	<pre class="propdef">
 	Name: text-wrap
-	Value: wrap | nowrap | balance | multi-line
+	Value: wrap | nowrap | balance
 	Initial: wrap
 	Applies to: <a>inline boxes</a> and <a>block containers</a>
 	Inherited: yes
@@ -223,20 +223,10 @@ Text Wrap Settings: the 'text-wrap' property</h3>
 			The exact algorithm is UA-defined.
 
 			UAs may treat this value as ''text-wrap/wrap'' if there are more than ten lines to balance.
-
-		<dt><dfn>multi-line</dfn>
-		<dd>
-			Same as ''text-wrap/wrap'' for  <a>inline boxes</a>.
-			Same as ''text-wrap/wrap'' for block-level elements,
-			except as below.
-
-			The exact algorithm is UA-defined.
-			The algorithm should consider multiple lines when making break decisions.
-			The UA should bias for best layout over speed.
-
-			ISSUE: This feature does not have CSSWG consensus, it is being proposed in <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/672#issuecomment-379723243">Issue 672</a>.
 	</dl>
 
+	ISSUE: There's some discussion about whether different wrapping algorithms (higher quality vs faster) need special keywords, see <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/672#issuecomment-379723243">Issue 672</a>.
+
 	Regardless of the 'text-wrap' value,
 	lines always break at forced breaks:
 	for all values,