Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[css-logical][css-position] Duplicate property definitions #6434

Closed
tidoust opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

[css-logical][css-position] Duplicate property definitions #6434

tidoust opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@tidoust
Copy link
Member

tidoust commented Jul 8, 2021

The following properties are defined both in css-logical-1 and in css-position-3:

  • inset-block-end
  • inset-block-start
  • inset-block
  • inset-inline-end
  • inset-inline-start
  • inset-inline
  • inset

The specs reference each other and I am not clear how I should read these definitions. Is there an authoritative definition for these properties? Where is it? Or a plan to converge to a signel authoritative definition?

Via w3c/webref#127 (comment)

@fantasai
Copy link
Collaborator

fantasai commented Jul 9, 2021

css-logical-1 supersedes CSS2 and css-position-3 supersedes css-logical-1 (which mainly contains these definitions because it had to build on CSS2 without css-position-3 existing).

@fantasai fantasai added css-logical-1 Current Work css-position-3 Current Work labels Jul 9, 2021
@tidoust
Copy link
Member Author

tidoust commented Jul 22, 2021

Thanks, this is good to know. Could the specs themselves be clearer about it? Or could the properties be dropped from css-logical-1 already? Typically, the css-position-3 spec is clear that it supersedes CSS2, but it does not talk about css-logical-1.

@fantasai
Copy link
Collaborator

fantasai commented Sep 3, 2021

@tidoust Done. Thanks for the suggestion. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants