Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add did:noosphere method #552

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Add did:noosphere method #552

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

zellmerd
Copy link

DID Method Registration

As a DID method registrant, I have ensured that my DID method registration complies with the following statements:

@TallTed

This comment was marked as resolved.

@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Apr 1, 2024

@MizukiSonoko
Copy link
Collaborator

MizukiSonoko commented Apr 2, 2024

@zellmerd
Hello!
I have read specification ,
There is no section of Security and Privacy Considerations
Could you add above sections?
Regards

@KDean-Dolphin
Copy link
Collaborator

The specification contains the following text:

Note: Within the following DID document schema are the additional fields previousVersionId and originalVersionId. These fields are not included in the W3C DID document specification, but they were deemed necessary to support versioning and traceability of DID documents within the Noosphere.

Version control is handled at the DID metadata level, through versionId and nextVersionId. Relationships between DIDs may also be specified using equivalentId and canonicalId. The specification should make use DID metadata rather than defining custom attributes.

No further review performed.

@zellmerd
Copy link
Author

@MizukiSonoko @KDean-Dolphin thank you for your feedback thus far, and thank you for your patience in awaiting updates to our DID method. Just a quick update - I have been working to resolve these outstanding issues, and I will be meeting with the team tomorrow (6/12) to finalize the necessary changes before updating our DID method specification.

Copy link
Member

@msporny msporny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The specification is missing a Security and Privacy Considerations section. Please see this specification for a good example of what to include:

https://did-dht.com/#security-and-privacy-considerations

@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Oct 14, 2024

Re-ping @zellmerd to add a better Security and Privacy Considerations section. See this comment for more info: #552 (review)

@zellmerd zellmerd closed this Oct 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants