-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add did:noosphere method #552
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
New DID Method review volunteers, please review this DID Method. /cc @apuchitnis @stenreijers @gatemezing @esaung @michallis @richardwinputra @adam-burns @Steffytan @MizukiSonoko @rajivrajani @genaris @harleyjackthomas @ajile-in @KDean-Dolphin |
@zellmerd |
The specification contains the following text:
Version control is handled at the DID metadata level, through No further review performed. |
@MizukiSonoko @KDean-Dolphin thank you for your feedback thus far, and thank you for your patience in awaiting updates to our DID method. Just a quick update - I have been working to resolve these outstanding issues, and I will be meeting with the team tomorrow (6/12) to finalize the necessary changes before updating our DID method specification. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The specification is missing a Security and Privacy Considerations section. Please see this specification for a good example of what to include:
Re-ping @zellmerd to add a better Security and Privacy Considerations section. See this comment for more info: #552 (review) |
DID Method Registration
As a DID method registrant, I have ensured that my DID method registration complies with the following statements:
contactEmail
address [OPTIONAL].verifiableDataRegistry
entry [OPTIONAL].