Letting users override CSS "as desired" is unclear #1605
Labels
EPUB33
Issues addressed in the EPUB 3.3 revision
Spec-ReadingSystems
The issue affects the EPUB Reading Systems 3.3 Recommendation
Status-Proposed Solution
A proposed solution has been included in the issue for working group review
https://w3c.github.io/epub-specs/epub33/rs/#confreq-css-user-styles says
It SHOULD allow users to override the EPUB Creator's style sheets as desired.
First,
SHOULD
seems too aggressive here. If an RS doesn't want to, isn't that an OK decision? I recommend dropping toMAY
.Secondly, "as desired" suggests letting users upload their own stylesheets, or at least suggests nothing in particular. I think we mean "should let users change font size, dark mode, and maybe a couple other things like line-spacing or paragraph justification."
At most, that handful of options should (maybe) be
SHOULD
, and most other propertiesSHOULD NOT
be user-overrideable; it's way too hard for a publisher to ensure their book won't break if users can override arbitrary (or just different) properties in different RSes.Can we consider dropping to
MAY
, and rephrase "as desired" to be more specific, possibly adding a list ofSHOULD NOT
s?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: