Require decision by both the facilitator and team to abandon chartering #983
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
frivoal
added
Needs Review
Agenda+
TallTed
reviewed
Jan 23, 2025
| @@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@ Charter Refinement</h3> | |||
| The [=charter refinement=] phase concludes when there is either: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| The [=charter refinement=] phase concludes when there is either: | |
| The [=charter refinement=] phase concludes when there is either of the following: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #982
In terms of phrasing, I opted to keep the idea of a decision by the facilitator, confirmed by a decision of the team, rather than something like a team decision to accept a proposal by facilitator, because hooking into the notion of Chair Decision gives us an explicit statement that this is something they do in the own judgement, not based on the consensus of the group. And given that a key reason for giving up on a charter could be that the relevant community is proving incapable of consensus (which could possibly even extend to the question of whether to give up), that seems relevant.