Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add iana consideration section #176

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 5, 2018
Merged

add iana consideration section #176

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 5, 2018

Conversation

siusin
Copy link
Contributor

@siusin siusin commented Oct 24, 2018

To register the Timing-Allow-Origin header.


Preview | Diff

index.html Outdated
<p>This section registers <a>Timing-Allow-Origin</a> as a <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3864#section-4.2.2">Provisional Message Header</a>.</p>
<dl>
<dt>Header field name:</dt><dd><pre class="abnf">Timing-Allow-Origin</pre></dd>
<dt>Applicable protocol:</dt><dd><a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616">http</a></dd>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we be pointing at 2616? @mnot /@reschke?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I've removed the pointer.

index.html Outdated
<dl>
<dt>Header field name:</dt><dd><pre class="abnf">Timing-Allow-Origin</pre></dd>
<dt>Applicable protocol:</dt><dd><a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616">http</a></dd>
<dt>Status:</dt><dd>standard</dd>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it be "provisional" or "standard"?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this is a Recommendation, standard.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RT is still in CR, so I modified it to "provisional".

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, but it's on the recommendation track.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, but it's on the recommendation track.

so it should be "standard"?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.

Copy link
Contributor

@yoavweiss yoavweiss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks :)

@yoavweiss yoavweiss merged commit e408afe into w3c:gh-pages Nov 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants