Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exchanged references to Controller Documents to CIDs #1589

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

iherman
Copy link
Member

@iherman iherman commented Feb 4, 2025

Now that CID is published...


Preview | Diff

@iherman iherman self-assigned this Feb 4, 2025
@iherman iherman added the editorial Purely editorial changes to the specification. label Feb 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

@TallTed TallTed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@iherman
Copy link
Member Author

iherman commented Feb 5, 2025

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2025-02-06

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

2.1. Exchanged references to Controller Documents to CIDs (pr vc-data-model#1589)

See github pull request vc-data-model#1589.

Brent Zundel: this updates references to CIDs in the spec.

Ivan Herman: there are six pull requests that are essentially identical in six different places.
… it's nothing, really.
… the CID spec is now published. Short name is changed.
… It's part of the reference generator used by respec.
… I went through all the document that I believe have adjusted all informative and normative references.

Manu Sporny: +1 to this PR and the others. Thanks for raising them.

Copy link
Contributor

@longpd longpd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approve this change to reference controller docs as CIDs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial Purely editorial changes to the specification.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants