prop or att

[KerstinProbiesch]

Dfferent markup for property in ARIA-techniques:

"aria-required property" (like in 411, 513 - prop) or
"aria-describedby property" (like in 2052 - att) and "aria-labelledby property" (like in 1330-1335 - att)?

[awkawk]

If we talk about "the aria-label property" then we should use . Similarly, if we say "the input should have aria-label set to..." then we're talking about the attribute and should use .

We should fix these for consistency, but currently it is not super-high priority since both prop and att are transformed to <code> elements in the HTML. I'll leave open as a reminder...

[KerstinProbiesch]

Because Github is killing the Markup in comments, I think it's better to write att and prop. I went through the document short and saw some missing markup. I can do that in the next week.

[awkawk]

Thanks for all of your edits to address att and prop in the source documents.