Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Match roles when elements dont exist on both sides #491

Merged

Conversation

MLenterman
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@MLenterman
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Draft PR includes example of the fix that needs to be aplied to all kerngegevens for all betrokkeneTypen. Included testcases for NNP testing for correct behavior. Testcase should be replicated for each betrokkeneType

@MLenterman MLenterman force-pushed the match-roles-when-elements-dont-exist-on-both-sides branch from d350f61 to e3236c1 Compare December 20, 2024 14:38
@MLenterman MLenterman marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2024 14:39
@MLenterman MLenterman force-pushed the match-roles-when-elements-dont-exist-on-both-sides branch from e3236c1 to 1bd568b Compare December 20, 2024 14:39
@MLenterman MLenterman enabled auto-merge (rebase) December 20, 2024 16:22
@mericakgul mericakgul self-requested a review January 8, 2025 09:21
@MLenterman MLenterman force-pushed the match-roles-when-elements-dont-exist-on-both-sides branch from 1bd568b to f4d0d0f Compare January 9, 2025 13:15
@MLenterman MLenterman merged commit 24de422 into master Jan 9, 2025
7 checks passed
@MLenterman MLenterman deleted the match-roles-when-elements-dont-exist-on-both-sides branch January 9, 2025 13:27
@WeAreFrank-BOT
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.22.9 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
3 participants