Generate lots more .dist.yml files #801
Conversation
| description: The `abs()` and `sign()` CSS functions compute the absolute value or the sign of the input. | ||
| spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#sign-funcs | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is correct, it's in progress in Chrome: https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40253181
| spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#widget-accent | ||
| usage_stats: https://chromestatus.com/metrics/css/timeline/popularity/695 | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: low |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-animations-2/#animation-composition | ||
| usage_stats: https://chromestatus.com/metrics/css/timeline/popularity/743 | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: low |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#aspect-ratio | ||
| usage_stats: https://chromestatus.com/metrics/css/timeline/popularity/657 | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: high |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/aspect-ratio#browser_compatibility
The aspect_ratio_computed_from_attributes bits were supported slightly earlier, but I don't think that's worth treating as a separate feature now.
| description: "The `:autofill` pseudo-class matches `<input>` elements that have been filled in automatically by the browser." | ||
| spec: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/semantics-other.html#selector-autofill | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: low |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:autofill#browser_compatibility
This was supported with a prefix earlier, but that doesn't count as Baseline.
| spec: https://www.iso.org/standard/87621.html | ||
| caniuse: colr-v1 | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://caniuse.com/colr-v1 agrees.
| baseline: low | ||
| baseline_low_date: 2023-05-09 | ||
| support: | ||
| chrome: "103" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Large parts were supported much earlier, need to review if we should split or override:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/CompressionStream#browser_compatibility
| - https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-1/#dom-documentorshadowroot-adoptedstylesheets | ||
| usage_stats: https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/2846 | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is probably caused by the note in https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/CSSStyleSheet/CSSStyleSheet#browser_compatibility
Need to review and do an editorial override.
| baseline: low | ||
| baseline_low_date: 2023-09-18 | ||
| support: | ||
| chrome: "117" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The important parts were supported much earlier. Need to review:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/contain-intrinsic-size#browser_compatibility
| status: | ||
| baseline: false | ||
| support: | ||
| chrome: "111" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://caniuse.com/css-container-queries-style agrees too, only difference is that it calls out that it's limited to custom properties. I suspect it will remain like that ~indefinitely and that'll just be what the feature is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I put a suggestion relating to this here: https://github.com/web-platform-dx/web-features/pull/751/files#r1557476030
| caniuse: declarative-shadow-dom | ||
| usage_stats: https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4421 | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: low |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| name: Mutually exclusive <details> elements | ||
| spec: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/interactive-elements.html#attr-details-name | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| spec: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/interactive-elements.html#the-details-element | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: high | ||
| baseline_low_date: 2020-01-15 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The toggle event is a newer addition and I think we should do an override to ignore it:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLDetailsElement#browser_compatibility
| spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#exponent-funcs | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: low | ||
| baseline_low_date: 2023-12-07 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-optical-sizing-def | ||
| usage_stats: https://chromestatus.com/metrics/css/timeline/popularity/647 | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: high |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| baseline: low | ||
| baseline_low_date: 2022-03-14 | ||
| support: | ||
| chrome: "83" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://caniuse.com/transforms3d disagrees.
| status: | ||
| baseline: false | ||
| support: | ||
| chrome: "117" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#trig-funcs | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: low | ||
| baseline_low_date: 2023-03-13 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#user-pseudos | ||
| status: | ||
| baseline: low | ||
| baseline_low_date: 2023-11-02 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| baseline_low_date: 2021-08-10 | ||
| baseline_high_date: 2024-02-10 | ||
| support: | ||
| chrome: "62" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is 62 instead of 61 due to the events in https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/VisualViewport#browser_compatibility, but that was just missing onresize and onscroll properties. I think this should be an editorial override.
|
@ddbeck this should now be quite easy to review. For everything that remains, I've linked to the entry point to the API and confirmed the versions match, and when there's a caniuse entry I've checked that. I'll submit separate PRs for the hard cases. |
| support: | ||
| chrome: "76" | ||
| chrome_android: "76" | ||
| edge: "17" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oops, https://caniuse.com/css-backdrop-filter disagrees about this. Will back out to look at separately.
| baseline: low | ||
| baseline_low_date: 2024-02-20 | ||
| support: | ||
| chrome: "111" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://caniuse.com/declarative-shadow-dom disagrees. Will back out.
| baseline_low_date: 2015-07-29 | ||
| baseline_high_date: 2018-01-29 | ||
| support: | ||
| chrome: "5" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://caniuse.com/input-search has slightly different data. I'll back this out.
These are cases that were excluded from web-platform-dx#801 due to some complication, small or large.
These are cases that were excluded from web-platform-dx#801 due to some complication, small or large.
| chrome_android: "121" | ||
| edge: "121" | ||
| compat_features: | ||
| - css.properties.font-palette.palette-mix_function |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hold up, are we using the right key? Should this be css.properties.font-palette.animation_computed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The palette-mix() function can in principle be used without animations, but the only reason it was implemented was for animations. So I think it makes sense in this entry. But I'll also add css.properties.font-palette.animation_computed in a separate PR, to be landed after this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, great. Thank you—approving and merging now.
These are cases that were excluded from web-platform-dx#801 due to some complication, small or large.
These are cases that were excluded from web-platform-dx#801 due to some complication, small or large.
These are cases that were excluded from web-platform-dx#801 due to some complication, small or large.
No description provided.