Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct condition for opaque paths in base URL #245

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

jeremyroman
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeremyroman jeremyroman commented Jan 7, 2025

This PR fixes pathname processing for inputs that have opaque pathnames.

(Amended by editor to apply to the correct draft.)


Preview | Diff

This PR fixes pathname processing for inputs that have opaque pathnames.

(Amended by editor to apply to the correct draft.)
@jeremyroman
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@anonrig Whoops, just realized you changed the review draft and not spec.bs (which is the living standard). I'll just push a commit to move the change over (you should still be the git author on the commit). Review drafts are created periodically from snapshots of the living standard.

@jeremyroman jeremyroman merged commit 45d7e05 into whatwg:main Jan 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@jeremyroman jeremyroman deleted the whoops-wrong-draft branch January 7, 2025 21:58
@anonrig
Copy link
Contributor

anonrig commented Jan 7, 2025

Ah, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants