Skip to content

support for nats.io as trigger? #1577

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

That makes a lot of sense but I think to reduce complexity you could still make it work using a sidecar AND use autodiscovery.
For instance, you could have a naming scheme such that all scripts and flows under f/nats_discovery/mychannel will listen to mychannel.
This way, you can natively integrate into windmill current scheme without modifications and all the 'complexity' would be inside the sidecar.

It's not as complex as one might think because windmill expose webhooks that are triggered upon any changes such as deploying scripts and flows.

I am also open to have a native integration of NATS in windmill but that is a lot more complexity in both backend and frontend and I would think th…

Replies: 3 comments 7 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@skurfuerst
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
6 replies
@skurfuerst
Comment options

@skurfuerst
Comment options

@rubenfiszel
Comment options

@rubenfiszel
Comment options

@skurfuerst
Comment options

Answer selected by skurfuerst
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants