pull: Split SILOFL into SILOFL-1.0 and SILOFL-1.1 #19
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The title and linked text are for 1.1, but the description includes [1]: The Open Font License (including its original release, version 1.0) is a free copyleft license for fonts... as reported by Donald Robertson [2]. It would be nice if the FSF had separate identifiers or at least linked to their version of the 1.0 text; for now I'm just minting my own versioned identifiers in SPLITS and allowing the SILOFL-1.0 JSON to include the link to the 1.1 text in its 'uris' property. [1]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#SILOFL [2]: #7 (comment)
|
I've pushed a build of this into the `gh-pages-ofl-1.0-and-1.1 branch with cd2d6f3, in case folks want to see what gh-pages will look like if this PR lands. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The title and linked text are for 1.1, but the description includes:
as reported by @donaldr3.
It would be nice if the FSF had separate identifiers or at least linked to their version of the 1.0 text; for now I'm just minting my own versioned identifiers in
SPLITSand allowing theSILOFL-1.0JSON to include the link to the 1.1 text in itsurisproperty.