"xmpp.muc.role.get" -> room dead

[robotnic]

When I use the "xmpp.muc.role.get" stanza, I don't get an answer.
The connection seams to be dead after that stanza.

3:::{"type":0,"data":["xmpp.muc.role.get",{"room":"[email protected]","role":"participants"}],"id":8}

[lloydwatkin]

I'm unable to recreate this locally:

Are you able to provide further details/logs?

[robotnic]

You can test here
http://datenkueche.com/buddycloud/
(login -> groupchat -> type nickname -> press button at right bottom corner -> dead

Socket connections are going to
"https://xmpp-ftw.jit.su/"

[lloydwatkin]

Afraid without seeing logs I can't really help. May I suggest you do the following:

npm i xmpp-ftw-demo
cd node_modules/xmpp-ftw-demo
node index

Point your websocket connector at http://localhost:3000. Let me know any errors that appear whilst repeating your steps from above.

[robotnic]

I installed that again on my computer. Same bug.

After "xmpp.muc.role.get" no stanzas are received.

[lloydwatkin]

Can you run xmpp-ftw-demo with environment variable 'DEBUG' to '*', that
will tell you everything that is going on. Please post your logs in a gist.
On 19 Jan 2015 20:42, "bz" [email protected] wrote:

I installed that again on my computer. Same bug.

[image: bildschirmfoto von 2015-01-19 21 39 35]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/219020/5807456/d086c35e-a023-11e4-920d-c4c65a3ac13c.png

After "xmpp.muc.role.get" no stanzas are received.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#53 (comment)
.

[robotnic]

[TypeError: Cannot read property 'NS_ADMIN' of undefined]

[lloydwatkin]

Could you try changing this line https://github.com/xmpp-ftw/xmpp-ftw-muc/blob/master/lib/multi-user-chat.js#L352 to read

var items = stanza.getChild('query', self.NS_ADMIN)
            .getChildren('item')

...and let me know if that corrects things? (I suspect it will)

[robotnic]

That works. I made a pull request
#54

[lloydwatkin]

Excellent, I'll get merged and released next time I am at a computer.
On 20 Jan 2015 14:31, "bz" [email protected] wrote:

That works. I made a pull request
#54 #54

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#53 (comment)
.