Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(core-clp): Handle 0-byte reads when BufferReader's underlying buffer is fully consumed. #687

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

LinZhihao-723
Copy link
Member

@LinZhihao-723 LinZhihao-723 commented Jan 22, 2025

Description

The current BufferReader implementation doesn't handle cases when reading 0-byte from a fully consumed buffer. This error was triggered when using it in Python ffi library to deserialize an empty string value at the end of the buffer. The size of string is zero, meaning that we don't have to read any bytes from the underlying buffer, but the buffer still returns EndOfFile, and thus causing an incomplete IR exception.
This PR fixes this problem by adding a check for 0-byte reads.

Validation performed

  • Ensure all workflows passed.
  • Ensure the problem in Python ffi has been solved after applying this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved handling of zero-byte read operations in the buffer reading mechanism.
    • Prevents unnecessary processing when no bytes are requested for reading.

@LinZhihao-723 LinZhihao-723 requested a review from haiqi96 January 22, 2025 22:01
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the BufferReader.cpp file by introducing a new condition in the try_read method. When the number of bytes to read is zero, the method now sets num_bytes_read to zero and returns a success error code. This change allows the method to handle scenarios where no bytes are requested without proceeding with unnecessary operations, while keeping the original logic intact for cases where bytes are required.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/core/src/clp/BufferReader.cpp Added a condition to handle zero-byte read requests by setting num_bytes_read to zero and returning ErrorCode_Success

Suggested reviewers

  • kirkrodrigues

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between afc5e9e and 624e9cb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/core/src/clp/BufferReader.cpp (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/core/src/clp/BufferReader.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (11)
  • GitHub Check: centos-stream-9-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-jammy-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: centos-stream-9-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-jammy-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-focal-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-focal-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-14, false)
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-14, true)
  • GitHub Check: lint-check (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-13, false)
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-13, true)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/core/src/clp/BufferReader.cpp (1)

63-66: Consider adding a comment to document the 0-byte read behaviour.

While the implementation is correct, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining that 0-byte reads are valid operations that always succeed. This would help future maintainers understand the intentional behaviour.

+    // A request to read 0 bytes is always successful, regardless of the buffer state
     if (0 == num_bytes_to_read) {
         num_bytes_read = 0;
         return ErrorCode_Success;
     }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c00a94 and afc5e9e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/core/src/clp/BufferReader.cpp (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
components/core/src/clp/BufferReader.cpp (1)

Pattern **/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,ts,tsx}: - Prefer false == <expression> rather than !<expression>.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
  • GitHub Check: centos-stream-9-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-focal-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-jammy-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-focal-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: centos-stream-9-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-jammy-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-14, false)
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-14, true)
  • GitHub Check: lint-check (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-13, false)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-13, true)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/core/src/clp/BufferReader.cpp (1)

63-66: LGTM! The implementation correctly handles 0-byte reads.

The added check properly handles the case when no bytes are requested to be read, preventing unnecessary EndOfFile errors. This aligns well with the PR's objective of fixing 0-byte reads when deserializing empty strings.

@@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ auto BufferReader::try_read(char* buf, size_t num_bytes_to_read, size_t& num_byt
throw OperationFailed(ErrorCode_BadParam, __FILENAME__, __LINE__);
}

if (0 == num_bytes_to_read) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One concern, when only I read this code, I thought the copy doesn't handle 0 bytes copy.

Then after reading the case description, I realized that the issue is when (0 == remaining_data_size).

If I were to write this code, I might put this if-clause under (0 == remaining_data_size). That said, I feel it's also ok to handle the 0 bytes read earlier so the function doesn't do unnecessary work.

Up to you which you choose.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I put it this way mainly for efficiency. I could move it inside the if block

@LinZhihao-723 LinZhihao-723 requested a review from haiqi96 January 22, 2025 22:23
Copy link
Contributor

@haiqi96 haiqi96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. The title looks ok as well.

@LinZhihao-723 LinZhihao-723 merged commit 66067d6 into y-scope:main Jan 22, 2025
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants