Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ListEnvelope.java:41-45: ListEnvelope should only... #1185

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Sep 15, 2019 · 12 comments
Closed

ListEnvelope.java:41-45: ListEnvelope should only... #1185

0pdd opened this issue Sep 15, 2019 · 12 comments

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Sep 15, 2019

The puzzle 947-4efcb5fb from #947 has to be resolved:

* @todo #947:30min ListEnvelope should only delegates all the methods
* of List to the wrapped List. See IterableEnvelope for an example.
* If needed ListOf should have some methods that were previously here
* and implement List instead of extending ListEnvelope.
* Again see IterableOf for an example.

The puzzle was created by Victor Noël on 30-Jun-19.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 15, 2019

@paulodamaso/z please, pay attention to this issue

@0crat 0crat added the scope label Sep 15, 2019
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 15, 2019

Job #1185 is now in scope, role is DEV

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 16, 2019

The job #1185 assigned to @victornoel/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@0crat wait for #1184 to be fixed first as it is the superclass of ListEnvelope

@0crat 0crat added the waiting label Sep 21, 2019
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 21, 2019

@0crat wait for #1184 to be fixed first as it is the superclass of ListEnvelope (here)

@victornoel The impediment for #1185 was registered successfully by @victornoel/z

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@0crat wait for #1255 to be merged

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Dec 1, 2019

@0crat wait for #1255 to be merged (here)

@victornoel Job #1185 is already on hold

victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2019
victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2019
victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2019
victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2019
victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2020
victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2020
victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2020
victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2020
victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2020
@0pdd 0pdd closed this as completed Feb 6, 2020
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Feb 6, 2020

The puzzle 947-4efcb5fb has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 6, 2020

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @victornoel/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 6, 2020

Order was finished, quality is "good": +35 point(s) just awarded to @victornoel/z

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 6, 2020

Quality review completed: +4 point(s) just awarded to @sereshqua/z

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants