Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Paged.java:38-40: Replace the constructor so that instead... #1538

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 13 comments
Closed

Paged.java:38-40: Replace the constructor so that instead... #1538

0pdd opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 13 comments

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Jan 25, 2021

The puzzle 1464-a8b18c11 from #1464 has to be resolved:

* @todo #1464:30min Replace the constructor so that instead it takes a {@link Iterable}
* as first and a {@code Func<Iterable, Iterable>} as next in order to homogenise it with
* the other {@link Iterable} implementations.

The puzzle was created by @baudoliver7 on 19-Jan-21.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

Edit from ARC: see also #1595 for some more details on this task.

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Jan 25, 2021

This puzzle inherited milestone 1.0 from issue #1464.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 2, 2021

The job #1538 assigned to @SergiusAC/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@SergiusAC
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat refuse

@SergiusAC
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat status

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 3, 2021

@0crat refuse (here)

@SergiusAC The user @SergiusAC/z resigned from #1538, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 3, 2021

@0crat status (here)

@SergiusAC This is what I know about this job in C63314D6Z, as in §32:

  • The job #1538 is in scope for 3mon
  • The role is DEV
  • The job is not assigned to anyone
  • The budget is not set yet
  • These users are banned and won't be assigned:
  • Job footprint (restricted area)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 3, 2021

@0crat refuse (here)

@SergiusAC Job refused in 20 hours - no penalty, see §6

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@0crat assign @SergiusAC

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 3, 2021

@0crat assign @SergiusAC (here)

@victornoel The job #1538 assigned to @SergiusAC/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

SergiusAC added a commit to SergiusAC/cactoos that referenced this issue May 5, 2021
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented May 7, 2021

The puzzle 1464-a8b18c11 has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 7, 2021

There is an unrecoverable failure on my side. Please, submit it here:

PID: 4@e9e4b655-9073-4bf2-b156-3422abacb233, thread: PQ-C63314D6Z
com.jcabi.xml.StrictXML[124] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: 1 error(s) in XML document: -1:-1: Duplicate unique value [gh:yegor256/cactoos#1538] declared for identity constraint of element "speed".

0.55.1: CID: 5f66501b-3db2-4e89-95b5-a732edc68afc, Type: "Order was finished"

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 7, 2021

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @SergiusAC/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat 0crat added quality/good and removed qa labels May 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants