Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1445 scalarof #1528

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 16, 2021
Merged

1445 scalarof #1528

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 16, 2021

Conversation

victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

Some more changes for #1445. I took this opportunity to cleanup and improve test coverage

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@0crat refuse

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 14, 2021

@0crat refuse (here)

@victornoel The user @fabriciofx/z resigned from #1528, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 14, 2021

@victornoel/z everybody who has role REV is banned at #1528; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@0crat assign @baudoliver7

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@baudoliver7 is it ok if I assign this to you? If not just say so and refuse it, if yes, I can add you as a REV to the project also if you are up for it :)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 15, 2021

@0crat assign @baudoliver7 (here)

@victornoel This pull request #1528 is assigned to @baudoliver7/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @victornoel/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@baudoliver7
Copy link
Contributor

baudoliver7 commented Jan 16, 2021

@victornoel It's ok for me. You can add me as a REV to the project too, thx :)

Copy link
Contributor

@baudoliver7 baudoliver7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@victornoel Please, take a look.

src/main/java/org/cactoos/scalar/And.java Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test/java/org/cactoos/scalar/AndInThreadsTest.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test/java/org/cactoos/scalar/AndInThreadsTest.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 16, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1528 (1cb1b88) into master (ecb0cf4) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1528      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     90.79%   90.82%   +0.03%     
- Complexity     1555     1556       +1     
============================================
  Files           284      284              
  Lines          3670     3672       +2     
  Branches        125      125              
============================================
+ Hits           3332     3335       +3     
+ Misses          308      306       -2     
- Partials         30       31       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/main/java/org/cactoos/proc/ForEach.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 2.00 <0.00> (ø)
...c/main/java/org/cactoos/proc/ForEachInThreads.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 2.00 <0.00> (ø)
...c/main/java/org/cactoos/proc/ForEachWithIndex.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 2.00 <0.00> (ø)
src/main/java/org/cactoos/proc/ProcOf.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 4.00 <2.00> (+1.00)
src/main/java/org/cactoos/scalar/And.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 11.00 <3.00> (+1.00)
src/main/java/org/cactoos/scalar/AndInThreads.java 84.09% <100.00%> (ø) 16.00 <2.00> (ø)
src/main/java/org/cactoos/scalar/AndWithIndex.java 69.56% <100.00%> (+7.06%) 7.00 <1.00> (ø)
src/main/java/org/cactoos/scalar/Or.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 12.00 <2.00> (ø)
src/main/java/org/cactoos/scalar/Solid.java 90.00% <0.00%> (-10.00%) 3.00% <0.00%> (-1.00%)
src/main/java/org/cactoos/io/Zip.java 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) 4.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
... and 23 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ecb0cf4...1cb1b88. Read the comment docs.

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

victornoel commented Jan 16, 2021

@baudoliver7 great, I will add you to cactoos as REV then, and thank you for the review, I answered them and marked those I fixed as resolved.

@victornoel victornoel mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2021
@baudoliver7
Copy link
Contributor

baudoliver7 commented Jan 16, 2021

@victornoel It's ok for me. Thank you for the training that you gave me :)

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@baudoliver7 thanks 👍

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Jan 16, 2021

@rultor merge

@victornoel OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit 865f249 into yegor256:master Jan 16, 2021
@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Jan 16, 2021

@rultor merge

@victornoel Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 8min)

@0crat 0crat removed the 0crat/scope label Jan 16, 2021
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 16, 2021

Job was finished in 16 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36)

@0crat 0crat added the qa label Jan 16, 2021
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 16, 2021

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @baudoliver7/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat 0crat removed the qa label Jan 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants