You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@yegor256 I need some clarification on the product you want here :)
What I'd like to get out of this ticket is:
Clarification of whether or not dynamically provisioning EC2 instances is a requirement still given that ECS is out.
If it's not a requirement anymore and those tickets can be closed, clarification on whether or not ECS can be made a requirement instead.
Background
Currently I see the following open issues waiting to be implemented: #755 #824 #825 #826 #827
They all revolve around implementing functionality that will allow on-demand provisioning of EC2 instances, that Rultor can then SSH into.
Given that:
I in Expose Docker API over HTTPS #1020 hopefully clarified the weakness of the SSH/Bash architecture currently used and Rultor should be moved towards the Docker REST API
Those tickets are very old ( opened Jan-April 2015 ) and Amazon released ECS meanwhile, offering what is to be implemented here out of the box seemingly
.... I think, based on the information in the currently open issues, the above tickets should be closed and substituted with a a set of tickets implementing ECS use instead since:
Dynamically setting up docker Daemons on EC2 would simply be reinventing ECS
Implementing ECS would require significantly less effort than dynamically setting up EC2 instances
In addition to the eventually pretty much mandatory move to the Docker REST API this would only require implementing the ECS interaction
ECS task definitions already provide exactly what would have to be implemented in the above tasks (setting up and tearing down of the container etc.).
=> I think implementing what above tickets suggest would require a lot more resources and leave us with a way less stable result compared to implementing ECS instead.
@yegor256 I need some clarification on the product you want here :)
What I'd like to get out of this ticket is:
Background
Currently I see the following open issues waiting to be implemented:
#755
#824
#825
#826
#827
They all revolve around implementing functionality that will allow on-demand provisioning of EC2 instances, that Rultor can then SSH into.
Given that:
.... I think, based on the information in the currently open issues, the above tickets should be closed and substituted with a a set of tickets implementing ECS use instead since:
=> I think implementing what above tickets suggest would require a lot more resources and leave us with a way less stable result compared to implementing ECS instead.
Let me know what to plan for here @yegor256 :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: