Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify Plans For EC2 Tickets Given ECS GA #1021

Closed
original-brownbear opened this issue Feb 23, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Clarify Plans For EC2 Tickets Given ECS GA #1021

original-brownbear opened this issue Feb 23, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@original-brownbear
Copy link
Contributor

@yegor256 I need some clarification on the product you want here :)

What I'd like to get out of this ticket is:

  • Clarification of whether or not dynamically provisioning EC2 instances is a requirement still given that ECS is out.
  • If it's not a requirement anymore and those tickets can be closed, clarification on whether or not ECS can be made a requirement instead.

Background

Currently I see the following open issues waiting to be implemented:
#755
#824
#825
#826
#827

They all revolve around implementing functionality that will allow on-demand provisioning of EC2 instances, that Rultor can then SSH into.
Given that:

  1. I in Expose Docker API over HTTPS #1020 hopefully clarified the weakness of the SSH/Bash architecture currently used and Rultor should be moved towards the Docker REST API
  2. Those tickets are very old ( opened Jan-April 2015 ) and Amazon released ECS meanwhile, offering what is to be implemented here out of the box seemingly

.... I think, based on the information in the currently open issues, the above tickets should be closed and substituted with a a set of tickets implementing ECS use instead since:

  • Dynamically setting up docker Daemons on EC2 would simply be reinventing ECS
  • Implementing ECS would require significantly less effort than dynamically setting up EC2 instances
    • In addition to the eventually pretty much mandatory move to the Docker REST API this would only require implementing the ECS interaction
    • ECS task definitions already provide exactly what would have to be implemented in the above tasks (setting up and tearing down of the container etc.).
  • Also we'd get rid of trivial maintenance issues like Rultor can't pull the image, 'pid' file is absent #1009, constantly causing downtime

=> I think implementing what above tickets suggest would require a lot more resources and leave us with a way less stable result compared to implementing ECS instead.

Let me know what to plan for here @yegor256 :)

@original-brownbear
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alex-palevsky assign @yegor256 please :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant