-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added recursive mount attr test #1428
Added recursive mount attr test #1428
Conversation
ed04ac3
to
f897dc2
Compare
Signed-off-by: higuruchi <[email protected]>
f897dc2
to
88452c5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, overall seems fine, there are some changes suggested and a couple of questions. Please take a look, and add tests for remaining mount types as well.
eprintln!("mounts_recursive rro error: {}", e); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
"rrw" => { /* TODO... */ } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise test looks fine, so please add other tests in this PR as well 👍
59a7afa
to
0356169
Compare
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1428 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.00% 68.73% -0.28%
==========================================
Files 119 120 +1
Lines 13041 13094 +53
==========================================
+ Hits 8999 9000 +1
- Misses 4042 4094 +52 |
0356169
to
f645736
Compare
f645736
to
882032c
Compare
Signed-off-by: higuruchi <[email protected]>
2f0adda
to
fe498b6
Compare
Signed-off-by: higuruchi <[email protected]>
fe498b6
to
40e113a
Compare
Signed-off-by: higuruchi <[email protected]>
Hey @higuruchi sorry I haven't looked at this in a while. Is there any issue you are facing? If you are busy and cannot work on this, it is ok too. We can add the partial tests and add another task for remaining. If there is any issue, feel free to ping or mention! |
@YJDoc2 |
Signed-off-by: higuruchi <[email protected]>
Hey @higuruchi No worries. If you are fine with it , we can merge this now, and when you get time you can come back and work on the rest if you want. In the meantime, if anyone else picks up the missing cases, we can progress that way too. |
Signed-off-by: higuruchi <[email protected]>
Please merge if there is no problem. |
Hey @higuruchi , sure, the PR seems mostly fine , its just that I didn't have time to take a final look. I'll try to merge this today.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm 👍
Hey @higuruchi , I'm merging this. Thank you for the contribution ! |
@YJDoc2 May I raise an issue showing the rest of the tests? |
Added test of rro mount option that implemented in #1398.
/tmp/
is used as the bind mount path used for testing.Now, this PR implement rro option test only.
And if this test is correct, add other option test(rrw, rnosuid...).
Signed-off-by: higuruchi [email protected]