Change the license from MIT to Apache 2.0 #200
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Not that there was anything wrong with it, but I set the license first without thinking about it, so I'll change it to Apache 2.0, which is more explicit.
|
@Furisto @yihuaf @nimrodshn @tsturzl @YJDoc2 |
Furisto
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2021
tsturzl
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2021
yihuaf
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2021
YJDoc2
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2021
|
Hey , should we be adding a contributing notice, along with a copyright notice as applicable? As far as I know apache license is more concrete in terms of copyright , so maybe we should add appropriate notice in readme if required? |
nimrodshn
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2021
Thank you for your input. Do you have any good examples? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not that there was anything wrong with it, but I set the license first without thinking about it, so I'll change it to Apache 2.0, which is more explicit.