Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Load config before start() #423
Load config before start() #423
Changes from all commits
168deab
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I misunderstood the behavior of
default_config_dir
, which I thought would create a directory.default_config_dir
just indicates a possible configuration directory, so it should be called here as the previous implementation.By the way, as
default_config_dir
returnsOption<PathBuf>
, I madeopts.config_dir
callclone()
to match these types. Maybe, I can delete thisclone()
by refactoringdefault_config_dir
, but it should be done in another PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I glossed over that too now. The naming does suggest some sort of creation. I'll put it on my list to try to make the intention clearer.
I would love that, as I am also unhappy about the state of
default_config_dir
, so feel free to open a PR on that, if you want to!