Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

arm,arm-timer dts compatible should be arm,armv8-timer #31946

Closed
galak opened this issue Feb 3, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #31967
Closed

arm,arm-timer dts compatible should be arm,armv8-timer #31946

galak opened this issue Feb 3, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #31967
Assignees
Labels
area: Devicetree bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug priority: low Low impact/importance bug

Comments

@galak
Copy link
Collaborator

galak commented Feb 3, 2021

The DTS compatible for the arm timer on v8 should be arm,armv8-timer and not arm,arm-timer

@galak galak added bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug priority: low Low impact/importance bug labels Feb 3, 2021
@galak galak self-assigned this Feb 3, 2021
galak added a commit to galak/zephyr that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2021
The compatible for the ARMv8 timer should have been arm,armv8-timer and
not arm,arm-timer.  The dts binding file name was correct, just the
compatible was wrong.  Rename dts, binding, and associated code to use
arm,armv8-timer.

Fixes zephyrproject-rtos#31946

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
nashif pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2021
The compatible for the ARMv8 timer should have been arm,armv8-timer and
not arm,arm-timer.  The dts binding file name was correct, just the
compatible was wrong.  Rename dts, binding, and associated code to use
arm,armv8-timer.

Fixes #31946

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: Devicetree bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug priority: low Low impact/importance bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant