Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update changelog for v27 #3488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

chore: update changelog for v27 #3488

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

lumtis
Copy link
Member

@lumtis lumtis commented Feb 6, 2025

Description

Add v27.0.1
Move an entry in unrelease

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced internal organization by modularizing components, resulting in improved maintainability and cleaner structure.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Resolved issues with transaction result parsing by integrating additional modules into the transaction interface registry, ensuring more reliable processing.

@lumtis lumtis requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2025 12:45
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changelog file has been updated to document recent changes. A new "Refactor" section has been added under the "Unreleased" category, consolidating details about the splitting of the Bitcoin observer and signer into smaller files with reusable functions. Additionally, a new version, v27.0.1, has been introduced with a fix that registers several modules in the cosmos interface registry to enable transaction result parsing. The previous refactor entry under v27.0.0 has been removed.

Changes

File Change Summary
changelog.md • Added a new Refactor section under Unreleased with an entry for splitting the Bitcoin observer and signer into smaller files, including renaming and type unification.
• Removed the corresponding refactor entry from the v27.0.0 section.
• Introduced a new version v27.0.1 with a fix that adds several modules (group, gov, params, consensus, feemarket, crisis, vesting) to the cosmos interface registry for parsing transaction results.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

no-changelog

Suggested reviewers

  • skosito
  • kingpinXD
  • gartnera

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
changelog.md (1)

17-22: Version v27.0.1 and Module Fix Entry Formatting
The new version entry "## v27.0.1" along with its "### Fixes" subsection is appropriately introduced to document the fix regarding registration of modules for the cosmos interface registry. However, consider adjusting the punctuation in the module list for consistency. For example, change:

-* [3460](https://github.com/zeta-chain/node/pull/3460) - add `group`,`gov`,`params`,`consensus`,`feemarket` ,`crisis`,`vesting` modules to the cosmos interface registry to enable parsing of tx results.
+* [3460](https://github.com/zeta-chain/node/pull/3460) - add `group`, `gov`, `params`, `consensus`, `feemarket`, `crisis`, `vesting` modules to the cosmos interface registry to enable parsing of tx results.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2bcd4f5 and efa6079.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • changelog.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: lint
  • GitHub Check: build-zetanode
  • GitHub Check: build-and-test
  • GitHub Check: gosec
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
changelog.md (1)

9-12: Refactor Section Addition and Entry Verification
The addition of the "### Refactor" header cleanly segregates refactoring updates under the Unreleased section. The entry for [3381] is descriptive and clearly communicates the splitting of the Bitcoin observer and signer along with improvements to outbound logic.

@lumtis lumtis added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 04270c4 Feb 6, 2025
46 checks passed
@lumtis lumtis deleted the fix-changelog-v27 branch February 6, 2025 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants