-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 348
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix for non-fallthrough null operations in map/flatMap/exists #1302
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ | ||
package io.getquill.ast | ||
|
||
object Implicits { | ||
implicit class AstOpsExt(body: Ast) { | ||
def +||+(other: Ast) = BinaryOperation(body, BooleanOperator.`||`, other) | ||
def +&&+(other: Ast) = BinaryOperation(body, BooleanOperator.`&&`, other) | ||
def +==+(other: Ast) = BinaryOperation(body, EqualityOperator.`==`, other) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
object +||+ { | ||
def unapply(a: Ast): Option[(Ast, Ast)] = { | ||
a match { | ||
case BinaryOperation(one, BooleanOperator.`||`, two) => Some((one, two)) | ||
case _ => None | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
object +&&+ { | ||
def unapply(a: Ast): Option[(Ast, Ast)] = { | ||
a match { | ||
case BinaryOperation(one, BooleanOperator.`&&`, two) => Some((one, two)) | ||
case _ => None | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
object +==+ { | ||
def unapply(a: Ast): Option[(Ast, Ast)] = { | ||
a match { | ||
case BinaryOperation(one, EqualityOperator.`==`, two) => Some((one, two)) | ||
case _ => None | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
object IsNotNullCheck { | ||
def apply(ast: Ast) = BinaryOperation(ast, EqualityOperator.`!=`, NullValue) | ||
|
||
def unapply(ast: Ast): Option[Ast] = { | ||
ast match { | ||
case BinaryOperation(cond, EqualityOperator.`!=`, NullValue) => Some(cond) | ||
case _ => None | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
object IsNullCheck { | ||
def apply(ast: Ast) = BinaryOperation(ast, EqualityOperator.`==`, NullValue) | ||
|
||
def unapply(ast: Ast): Option[Ast] = { | ||
ast match { | ||
case BinaryOperation(cond, EqualityOperator.`==`, NullValue) => Some(cond) | ||
case _ => None | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
object IfExistElseNull { | ||
def apply(exists: Ast, `then`: Ast) = | ||
If(IsNotNullCheck(exists), `then`, NullValue) | ||
|
||
def unapply(ast: Ast) = ast match { | ||
case If(IsNotNullCheck(exists), t, NullValue) => Some((exists, t)) | ||
case _ => None | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
object IfExist { | ||
def apply(exists: Ast, `then`: Ast, otherwise: Ast) = | ||
If(IsNotNullCheck(exists), `then`, otherwise) | ||
|
||
def unapply(ast: Ast) = ast match { | ||
case If(IsNotNullCheck(exists), t, e) => Some((exists, t, e)) | ||
case _ => None | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we avoid these implicits and use the objects directly? I'm afraid people will see the method available and use it even though it doesn't work for all ast nodes. Also, we could restrict the
object
s to support onlyBinaryOperation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we take them out, we would have statements like this:
That's really hard for me to parse unless I break it down into multiple lines and even then. At some point I might want to reduce some even more sophisticated simplification rules for null check statements which would make these even more complex.
I'm good with restricting to
BinaryOperation
though.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm suggesting removing only the implicits and calling the objects in this file directly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can certainly remove
reduce
, that makes sense, especially because BetaReduction is a noun.What about the
+||+
etc.. methods though? Then it would turn into:That's still pretty confusing to me so I'd rather leave them. Wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okay, let's keep them 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, will do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't make
+||+
and+&&+
limited toBinaryOperation
because of this:Since the AST is untyped, there's no way to know that the AST inside OptionExists must yield a
BinaryOperation
instance.