Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#2071: make pre-worker-removal init call deprecated #2072

Conversation

nmm0
Copy link
Collaborator

@nmm0 nmm0 commented Jan 18, 2023

Closes #2071

…ation function that takes in the worker count but make them deprecated to avoid breaking existing code
@nmm0 nmm0 requested review from PhilMiller and lifflander January 18, 2023 22:46
@nmm0 nmm0 linked an issue Jan 18, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@nmm0
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nmm0 commented Jan 18, 2023

I think some things are failing because of the unity builds

…ation caused deprecation warnings on some compilers
@nmm0
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nmm0 commented Jan 18, 2023

I think some things are failing because of the unity builds

nvm it was just an inconsistency between the ways that compilers different compilers handled things

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2072 (741c87b) into develop (96455a5) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2072      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    84.77%   84.74%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          721      722       +1     
  Lines        25598    25600       +2     
===========================================
- Hits         21701    21694       -7     
- Misses        3897     3906       +9     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/vt/collective/collective_ops.h 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/vt/vrt/collection/manager.impl.h 95.49% <0.00%> (-0.99%) ⬇️
src/vt/phase/phase_manager.cc 91.21% <0.00%> (ø)

@lifflander lifflander merged commit 54b4ebd into develop Jan 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make old initialization syntax deprecated instead of removed
3 participants