Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CP Staging] Bump react-native-live-markdown version to 0.1.221 #55509

Conversation

Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor

@Skalakid Skalakid commented Jan 21, 2025

Explanation of Change

Important

This PR should be merged together with the OldDot changes https://github.com/Expensify/Mobile-Expensify/pull/13373

This PR bump the Live Markdown library version to 0.1.221.

MOBILE-EXPENSIFY: 13373

Fixed Issues

$ #55115
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Emoji splitting

  1. Apply the changes from the OldDot PR (rename the live markdown patch file) so you can successfully run npm i
  2. Open the app
  3. Open any chat.
  4. Compose a message with two markdowns, being the second one "Bold" and an emoji. Example: :smile
  5. Check the bold markdown behaviour with this action.

With quote markdown, url text on tapping enter key not moved to next line

  1. Open chat
  2. Enter > jsjjd.com
  3. Send the message
  4. Edit the message
  5. Tap enter key and try to make url text into two lines

Compose box- Selected text isn't applied format

  1. At compose box of any conversation, type 1 line
  2. Select all text, choose Format: Bold and send message
  3. Type another line
  4. Select all text, choose Format: Italic and send message
  5. Type another line
  6. Select all text, choose Format: Underline and send message. We don't support underline text, nothing should be applied

Context menu format command

  1. Type anything on the composer
  2. Select some text on the composer
  3. Right-click or long-press to open the web context menu
  4. Select Format (iOS mWeb) or Font (Web Safari)
  5. Select Bold and Italic
  6. Verify the bold and italic markdown is added
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-01-23.at.10.01.06.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
chrome.mov
iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-01-21.at.13.46.06.mov

@Skalakid Skalakid marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2025 12:40
@Skalakid Skalakid requested a review from a team as a code owner January 21, 2025 12:40
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from sobitneupane January 21, 2025 12:40
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 21, 2025

@sobitneupane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team January 21, 2025 12:41
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane Please, make sure to test the hybrid app build with the associated oldApp PR

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-01-23.at.16.13.20.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-01-22.at.15.49.34.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-01-22.at.19.24.51.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-01-22.at.16.20.24.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-01-22.at.15.35.23.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-01-22.at.16.10.44.mov

Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test hybrid app build. You can view the workflow run here.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test hybrid app build. You can view the workflow run here.

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Jus testing something, dont mind me

Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
❌ FAILED ❌ ❌ FAILED ❌
The QR code can't be generated, because the Android build failed The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
N/A N/A
N/A N/A

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am experiencing an issue while testing on Android. The standalone app keeps crashing and the hybrid app keeps reloading on the splash screen after signing in. I faced the same issue earlier as well. So, I don't think it's related to the changes.

There are some git differences in Podfile.lock in the Mobile-Expensify submodule. Apart from that, changes test well.

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

I am experiencing an issue while testing on Android. The standalone app keeps crashing and the hybrid app keeps reloading on the splash screen after signing in. I faced the same issue earlier as well. So, I don't think it's related to the changes.

It runs without any issue on the main branch. @Skalakid Could you please double check it on your end?

@Skalakid Skalakid force-pushed the @Skalakid/bump-react-native-live-markdown-0.1.221 branch 2 times, most recently from cacb2d7 to e1a7fb3 Compare January 23, 2025 08:46
@Skalakid Skalakid force-pushed the @Skalakid/bump-react-native-live-markdown-0.1.221 branch from e1a7fb3 to a2b5f3a Compare January 23, 2025 08:47
@Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skalakid commented Jan 23, 2025

@sobitneupane I merged the latest main and the problem with building Android should be fixed now

Video

Screen.Recording.2025-01-23.at.10.01.06.mov

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

sobitneupane commented Jan 23, 2025

@Skalakid Thanks for the update. I was able to successfully build and run the hybrid app.

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from grgia January 23, 2025 10:34
@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@Skalakid Please add test steps from #54522 #53145

@Kicu
Copy link
Member

Kicu commented Jan 24, 2025

@shubham1206agra

This bump will include changes from new short mention. Will it break existing short mention mechanism since Expensify-common was not merged yet?

As far as short-mentions are concerned, merging this bump should not break anything. My changes only added handling to LM for the new short-mention tag, that could come from ExpensiMark.

If the tag never appears then nothing will happen. Once expensify-common is merged, then RNLM will be ready to handle it.

@Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor Author

rightly pointed out that these changes were not brought back. Are they not needed anymore? #55127 (files)

@mountiny brought back the changes that were reverted (588bb46)

@Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mountiny @grgia All things added, let's merge it to avoid conflicts and unblock other issues :D

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny changed the title Bump react-native-live-markdown version to 0.1.221 [HOLD] Bump react-native-live-markdown version to 0.1.221 Jan 24, 2025
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Alright, sorry, after https://github.com/Expensify/Mobile-Expensify/pull/13373 was merged I realized that:

  • if we CP another App PR to staging, the main from Mobile-Expensify will be used and that PR will go to staging
  • that would, however, make the staging build not working because the oldApp change will need this PR
  • we would have to CP this PR to staging too, however, the QA is 91% done with regression testing so that is not the right thing to do

So we are going to revert the oldApp PR and then merge them before next deploy.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny Can you merge this PR atleast? Since it does not break standalone App. You can merge HybridApp PR as per #55509 (comment)

@Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skalakid commented Jan 27, 2025

@shubham1206agra, we need to merge this PR with the patch rename in OldDot. Without it, we will have problems installing node_modules in HybridApp builds.

Here I prepared another PR with the patch version change cc @mountiny. Let's merge it :D

@mountiny mountiny changed the title [HOLD] Bump react-native-live-markdown version to 0.1.221 Bump react-native-live-markdown version to 0.1.221 Jan 28, 2025
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

the mobile-expensify change was merged https://github.com/Expensify/Mobile-Expensify/pull/13387

@mountiny mountiny changed the title Bump react-native-live-markdown version to 0.1.221 [CP Staging] Bump react-native-live-markdown version to 0.1.221 Jan 28, 2025
@mountiny mountiny merged commit 00f5edd into Expensify:main Jan 28, 2025
21 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
…eact-native-live-markdown-0.1.221

Bump react-native-live-markdown version to 0.1.221

(cherry picked from commit 00f5edd)

(CP triggered by mountiny)
@github-actions github-actions bot added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Jan 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.0.90-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.0.90-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 true ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging Ready To Build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants