-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added tooltip sense & add missing tooltips #5733
Conversation
@mountiny please test it and let me know what do you think? If this looks good, then I will move to the next step of "adding missing tooltips to leftover actions". |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@parasharrajat Tested this and love it! Great job Rajat 🎉
I have left just one styling comment to swap the order of the functions, otherwise code LGTM and feel free to continue with the other steps. Thank you for working on this improvement!
function isActive() { | ||
return active === true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
function deactivate() { | ||
return debouncedDeactivate(); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NAB: A bit nitty-gritty, but I would keep the order alphabetical same as you have it in the export default on lines 23-25.
Great. Thanks. I will finish it asap. |
Thank you, I mean, it is not n6 polish so no need to rush on this one especially if you have some other issues, which are considered to be n6 polish. But feel free to go ahead for sure :) |
@mountiny Changes done and ready. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code looks good to me, great job Rajat. As mentioned in the parent issue, I will keep this on hold for n6 as this was not requested as part on the polish and we want to avoid potential regressions as much as possible before the release.
Thank you very much for your work on this PR.
Hi @parasharrajat, The n6-hold was lifted so we can go ahead with this one. As this PR is touching more parts of code, I would prefer if we could merge |
@mountiny All set. |
@mountiny Ready for merge. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for your work on this and your patience @parasharrajat 🙇 Great job!
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
🚀 Deployed to production by @roryabraham in version: 1.1.10-2 🚀
|
Details
Fixed Issues
$ #5347
Tests | QA Steps
Tested On
Screenshots
Web
output_file.mp4
Mobile Web
Desktop
iOS
Android