-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 675
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Changes for F1888 Object Expiration Filtering #5768
Adding Changes for F1888 Object Expiration Filtering #5768
Conversation
ibm/service/cos/resource_ibm_cos_bucket_lifecycle_configuration_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ibm/service/cos/resource_ibm_cos_bucket_lifecycle_configuration_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ibm/service/cos/resource_ibm_cos_bucket_lifecycle_configuration_test.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
}, | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
"and": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can user provide combination of multiple filters along with other filter (tags, prefix...so on) if not can we add some conflicts with can't provider filter.0.and with other arguments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We cannot add other filters with each other.
But the parent element lifecycle_rule can multiple rules so we cant add the conflict like lifecycle.0.filter. to the arguments.
Can you fix conflicts |
Regression Result :
F1888_regression_result_latest.docx