Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Changes for F1888 Object Expiration Filtering #5768

Conversation

IBM-diksha
Copy link
Collaborator

@IBM-diksha IBM-diksha commented Nov 6, 2024

examples/ibm-cos-bucket/main.tf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/ibm-cos-bucket/main.tf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ibm/flex/structures.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ibm/flex/structures.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/cos_bucket_lifecycle_configuration.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/cos_bucket_lifecycle_configuration.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@IBM-diksha
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@IBM-diksha
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@IBM-diksha
Copy link
Collaborator Author

},
},
},
"and": {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can user provide combination of multiple filters along with other filter (tags, prefix...so on) if not can we add some conflicts with can't provider filter.0.and with other arguments

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We cannot add other filters with each other.
But the parent element lifecycle_rule can multiple rules so we cant add the conflict like lifecycle.0.filter. to the arguments.

@IBM-diksha IBM-diksha requested a review from hkantare December 16, 2024 12:51
@hkantare
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you fix conflicts

hkantare
hkantare previously approved these changes Dec 24, 2024
@hkantare hkantare merged commit ace0b9a into IBM-Cloud:master Dec 26, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants