Add TODOs to improve precision output later.

src/realizations/catchment/Bmi_C_Formulation.cpp

@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ std::string Bmi_C_Formulation::get_output_line_for_timestep(int timestep, std::s
         throw std::invalid_argument("Only current time step valid when getting output for BMI C formulation");
     }
 
+    // TODO: see Github issue 355: this design (and formulation output handling in general) needs to be reworked
     // Clear anything currently in there
     output_text_stream->str(std::string());
 

src/realizations/catchment/Bmi_Fortran_Formulation.cpp

@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ string Bmi_Fortran_Formulation::get_output_line_for_timestep(int timestep, std::
 
     // TODO: for now, just get current value, and ignore the timestep param
 
+    // TODO: see Github issue 355: this design (and formulation output handling in general) needs to be reworked
     // Clear anything currently in there
     output_text_stream->str(std::string());
 

src/realizations/catchment/Bmi_Multi_Formulation.cpp

@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ string Bmi_Multi_Formulation::get_output_line_for_timestep(int timestep, std::st
     // Start by first checking whether we are NOT just using the last module's values
     if (!is_out_vars_from_last_mod) {
 
+        // TODO: see Github issue 355: this design (and formulation output handling in general) needs to be reworked
         // Clear anything currently in the multi formulation's stream buffer
         output_text_stream->str(std::string());
 

src/realizations/catchment/Bmi_Py_Formulation.cpp

@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ string Bmi_Py_Formulation::get_output_line_for_timestep(int timestep, std::strin
     if (timestep != (next_time_step_index - 1)) {
         throw std::invalid_argument("Only current time step valid when getting output for BMI Python formulation");
     }
+
+    // TODO: see Github issue 355: this design (and formulation output handling in general) needs to be reworked
     // Clear anything currently in there
     output_text_stream->str(std::string());