Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

eval/tag: remove pull request author from reviewer list #370186

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Jan 2, 2025

Things done

Untested

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@Mic92 Mic92 requested a review from infinisil January 2, 2025 10:58
@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: policy discussion 6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions labels Jan 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux labels Jan 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I ran the full jq (maintainers -> reviewers) command locally. Works.

Assuming that ${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }} returns the correct value, which it should according to research, this should work in CI as well.

LGTM!

@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ jobs:
# There appears to be no API to request reviews based on GitHub IDs
jq -r 'keys[]' comparison/maintainers.json \
| while read -r id; do gh api /user/"$id"; done \
| jq -s '{ reviewers: map(.login) }' \
| jq -s --arg author "${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }}" '{ reviewers: map(.login) | map(select(. != $author)) }' \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can be simplified:

Suggested change
| jq -s --arg author "${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }}" '{ reviewers: map(.login) | map(select(. != $author)) }' \
| jq -s --arg author "${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }}" '{ reviewers: map(.login | select(. != $author)) }' \

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Jan 2, 2025
@infinisil
Copy link
Member

More complete fix: #370456

@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

Superseded by #370456.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: continuous integration Affects continuous integration (CI) in Nixpkgs, including Ofborg and GitHub Actions 6.topic: policy discussion 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants