Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replicate specification of Object extension into Storage Root extensi… #583

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

awoods
Copy link
Member

@awoods awoods commented Apr 7, 2022

…ons section

Resolves: #557

sub-directories other than extension sub-directories. Extension sub-directories
<span id="W016">SHOULD</span> be named according to a <a>registered extension name</a>. The specific
structure and function of the extension, as well as a declaration of the registered extension name
<span id="E113">MUST</span> be defined in one of the following locations:
Copy link

@pwinckles pwinckles Apr 7, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally, I would not include E113. It is impossible to enforce.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that we should drop E113 -- the "structure and function part" is not enforceable, and the notion of it being a registered name overlaps with the warning W016. (This also applies in the object extensions section for E068 and W013.)

Copy link
Contributor

@zimeon zimeon Apr 7, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I note this has tons of overlap with #565, will propose approach there. I think we could move forward with this PR (addressing the replication issue alone) by simply removing the text from the E113 sentence onward.

Copy link
Contributor

@zimeon zimeon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will need reworking in Markdown when #596 merged

awoods pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2022
This update replicates the Object extension specification text from Object extension into Storage Root extension

Resolves: #557

Supersedes: #583
@awoods
Copy link
Member Author

awoods commented Jun 22, 2022

Superseded by: #607

@awoods awoods closed this Jun 22, 2022
julianmorley pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2022
This update replicates the Object extension specification text from Object extension into Storage Root extension

Resolves: #557

Supersedes: #583
@rosy1280 rosy1280 deleted the issue-557a branch July 20, 2022 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve description of storage root extensions
3 participants