-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ACTUATOR_OUTPUT_STATUS MAVLink stream for ESCs #13145
Closed
irsdkv
wants to merge
4
commits into
PX4:master
from
irsdkv:pr-mavlink_stream_actuator_output_status
Closed
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bc1263b
ACTUATOR_OUTPUT_STATUS MAVLink stream for ESCs
irsdkv 8f32f76
Merge branch 'master' into pr-mavlink_stream_actuator_output_status
dagar 2907595
Merge branch 'master' into pr-mavlink_stream_actuator_output_status
irsdkv d216caf
Merge branch 'master' into pr-mavlink_stream_actuator_output_status
julianoes File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hamishwillee Is that message supposed to contain the feedback from the actuators? It's not clear to me from the message spec.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO ACTUATOR_OUTPUT_STATUS message should provide feedback from the actuators because of we can receive controls with ACTUATOR_CONTROL_TARGET message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bkueng It is the updated version of
SERVO_OUTPUT_RAW
. Discussed in mavlink/mavlink#926So my understanding is that this is just the raw PWM values we are outputing on all MAIN, AUX, whatever. Not feedback from actuator.
Can you review that chain and confirm you agree. If so, I will add note to it saying this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That was my understanding as well.
However that means the implementation here is not correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@irsdkv
ACTUATOR_CONTROL_TARGET
contains the values before the mixing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bkueng Cool, Assigned you clarification for review: mavlink/mavlink#1252
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bkueng so is this PR now correct or not? I'm confused.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not. I thought I wrote that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@irsdkv have you fixed the issue raised here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@julianoes I'm still confused.
What I should fix?