Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Boards: ARK Pi6X Flow #22829

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Boards: ARK Pi6X Flow #22829

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

AlexKlimaj
Copy link
Member

@AlexKlimaj AlexKlimaj commented Mar 3, 2024

This is a work in progress for the new ARK Pi6X flight controller.

https://arkelectron.com/product/ark-pi6x-flow

Airframe kits will be available through Droneblocks. I have added a placeholder airframe file for the kit.

IMG_1650_edited (Large)
IMG_1588_edited (Large)
IMG_1619_edited (Large)

@AlexKlimaj AlexKlimaj changed the title [WIP] Boards: ARK Pi6X [WIP] Boards: ARK Pi6X Flow Mar 3, 2024
@julianoes
Copy link
Contributor

Wow that name takes the Pixhawk, PX4, Pi naming confusion to a new level 😄

@dagar
Copy link
Member

dagar commented Mar 6, 2024

This is harmless to bring in if you'd like to continue working on it incrementally in main.

@AlexKlimaj AlexKlimaj force-pushed the pr-ark-pi6x branch 6 times, most recently from 92c618c to 1717b80 Compare March 29, 2024 00:22
@AlexKlimaj AlexKlimaj force-pushed the pr-ark-pi6x branch 2 times, most recently from 5c97908 to e0d04a6 Compare April 6, 2024 22:04
@AlexKlimaj AlexKlimaj changed the title [WIP] Boards: ARK Pi6X Flow Boards: ARK Pi6X Flow Apr 8, 2024
@AlexKlimaj AlexKlimaj requested a review from dagar April 8, 2024 22:53
dagar
dagar previously approved these changes Apr 10, 2024
dagar
dagar previously approved these changes Apr 10, 2024
@dagar dagar merged commit 1b1479a into PX4:main Apr 12, 2024
62 of 89 checks passed
@AlexKlimaj AlexKlimaj deleted the pr-ark-pi6x branch April 17, 2024 16:45
MaEtUgR added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
…'s no memory allocated with APP_RESERVATION_SIZE

I adepted to the nxt-v1 board which seems similar and has flash based params disabled. The reason I'm doing this change is becuase CI is failing with a combination of the hkust board support:
#22961 f7bc13d
and an additional check for the exact issue introduced with:
#22829 528ad1e
Comment on lines +75 to +76
* If APP_RESERVATION_SIZE is greater than 0 and
* FLASH_BASED_PARAMS is defined, throw a compile error
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment says the opposite of what it does below instead of explaining why. Could you please clarify? 😇

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably should say is not greater.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants