refactor:vitest to MemberDetailScreen #2662
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on refactoring the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
@shivasankaran18 Please fix the failed tests. |
|
@palisadoes @Cioppolo14 the tests are failing due to pre-existing issues in the codebase and are unrelated to the changes in the PR...These are even failing after cloning the repo and running the command without making any code change.. |
Please try to fix the cause of the issue. A past contributor may not have tested for all possible outcomes. We cannot merge code into the code base that is failing tests. |
shivasankaran18
force-pushed
the
issue-2556
branch
from
b1d2606 to
c745815
Compare
|
@CodeRabbit review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
jest.config.js (1)
Line range hint
1-83: Clean up configuration fileConsider the following maintenance tasks:
- Remove or uncomment the commented sections (e.g., watchPlugins)
- Document the transition status from Jest to Vitest
- Review coverage thresholds (currently at 20%) as they seem quite low for a mature project
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
jest.config.js(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
jest.config.js (1)
Learnt from: MayankJha014
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2619
File: vitest.config.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T15:54:04.872Z
Learning: The files `scripts/custom-test-env.js`, `src/utils/i18nForTest.ts`, and `vitest.setup.ts` are not test files and should not be included in the test pattern.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
jest.config.js (2)
46-46: Verify identity-obj-proxy dependency
The CSS module mapping is correctly configured, but let's ensure the required dependency is properly installed.
Let's verify the dependency and its version:
✅ Verification successful
CSS module configuration is properly set up with required dependency
The verification confirms that:
identity-obj-proxyis properly installed as a dev dependency in package.json- The codebase extensively uses CSS modules (found numerous .module.css files and imports)
- The jest configuration correctly maps CSS modules to the proxy
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if identity-obj-proxy is properly installed
# Check package.json for the dependency
rg "identity-obj-proxy" -A 5 -B 5 package.json
# Check if there are any other test files using CSS modules that might need updating
rg "\.module\.(css|scss|sass|less)" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 504
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for CSS module imports in JavaScript/TypeScript files
rg "\.module\.(css|scss|sass|less)" --type js --type ts
# Check if there are any CSS module files in the codebase
fd -e module.css -e module.scss -e module.sass -e module.less
# Verify if identity-obj-proxy is also listed in devDependencies (for more thorough check)
rg '"devDependencies"' -A 20 package.json
Length of output: 25117
13-14: Consider separating Jest and Vitest configurations
While excluding vitest.config.ts is correct, maintaining both Jest and Vitest configurations simultaneously might lead to confusion. Consider creating a migration plan to fully transition to Vitest.
Let's check if there are any other Jest-specific files that should be excluded or migrated:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the testing setup to provide a more accurate verification.
The exclusion of vitest.config.ts is appropriate during this transition phase
The codebase is actively maintaining both Jest and Vitest setups as evidenced by:
- Parallel test scripts for both frameworks in package.json
- Presence of both jest.config.js and vitest.config.ts
- Active dependencies for both testing frameworks
The exclusion of vitest.config.ts from Jest's coverage is correct and necessary to avoid confusion between the two testing setups during this transition period.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find Jest-specific configuration and test files
# Look for Jest-specific files and configurations
fd -e config.js -e setup.js -e spec.js -e spec.tsx -e test.js -e test.tsx . | grep -i jest
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Vitest-related files and configurations
fd -e config.ts -e setup.ts . | grep -i 'vitest\|test'
# Check content of package.json for test-related scripts and dependencies
cat package.json | jq '.scripts + .dependencies + .devDependencies' | grep -i 'jest\|vitest'
Length of output: 715
|
@palisadoes @Cioppolo14 fixed the failing tests.. |
varshith257
merged commit 4f05052
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Added Vitest to MemberDetail Screen
Issue Number: 2556
Fixes #2556
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Migrated the testing framework to Vitest.
Updated all test files and configurations to be compatible with Vitest's syntax and features.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
OrganizationScreentests to utilize CSS module references for improved maintainability.