Improve Code Coverage in src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx #3133
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces improvements to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (1)
35-35: Questioning the direct import oft.Since the file already utilizes
useTranslation(), directly importingtfrom'i18next'could lead to confusion or inconsistencies, especially if you rely on scoped translations (organizationPeople,common, etc.). Instead, consider consolidating all translation calls through one approach (i.e., destructured translation variables fromuseTranslation).src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx (1)
906-959: Enhance success path assertion
Although the test verifies that UI elements appear, consider adding an assertion to confirm that a success path (e.g., a success toast or an updated UI) is triggered after user creation.+ // Example assertion in your test after create button is clicked: + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith('User has been successfully created and added'); + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx(6 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx
[error] 902-904: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (3)
114-114: Nicely integrated error handling function.Replacing the manual error checks with
errorHandler(t, error)standardizes error management, making the code cleaner and more consistent across the application.
389-389: Potential fallback opportunity.By removing the nullish coalescing operator, you rely directly on
userDetails.user.image. If there's a possibility thatimagecould be undefined or empty, the fallbackAvataris properly used. This approach is acceptable, but double-check that all code paths guarantee a defineduserDetails.user.imageproperty when this block is reached.
444-447: Enhanced testability.Adding these data attributes (
data-testid="createUser") improves the ability to specifically target and test the modal header. This aligns well with the broader goal of increasing test coverage.src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx (16)
3-3: Import check
The import from@testing-library/reactis standard and appropriate.
25-25: Confirm library availability
Ensurereact-toastifyis properly installed and version-pinned inpackage.json.
31-37: Mock setup looks good
Thereact-toastifymodule mock is correctly implemented for testing toast calls.
645-648: Error message definitions
Defining error instances for different query failures is a clear and maintainable approach.
856-867: Mock signup response
This mock response for sign-up is well structured and consistent with your usage in tests.
868-900: Mock create-member response
Defining separate default mocks for membership creation helps keep tests organized.
961-1033: Error handling test coverage
These checks effectively verify that toast errors are shown when signup fails. Good coverage for negative paths.
1035-1112: Null user ID scenario
Properly handles a null_idscenario by verifyingtoast.errorusage.
1736-1763: Member query failure test
The toast error assertion ensures consistent UI feedback on query failure.
1765-1820: Admin query failure test
Testing with forced errors keeps coverage high and ensures resilient error handling.
1822-1880: User query failure test
Same pattern for verifying toasts on error: consistent and thorough.
1934-1969: Opening add user modal
The modal state transitions (open and close) are covered. No concerns noted.
1971-2041: Modal state management
Comprehensive test showing open, close, and toggle. Good approach to ensure stable UI.
2042-2086: Toast errors test
Verifies toast calls when user creation data is incomplete. Coverage is thorough.
2088-2155: GraphQL error handling
Checks for an error toast when add-member mutation fails, reinforcing robust error coverage.
2157-2206: createMember error test
Ensures that the user sees an appropriate toast error and that refetch is not invoked unexpectedly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx (4)
936-940: Remove console.log statements.These debug console.log statements should be removed before merging.
- console.log( - 'addnewusermodelcount', - screen.getAllByTestId('addNewUserModal'), - );Also applies to: 1000-1003, 1083-1086
902-954: Good test coverage for successful user creation flow.The test thoroughly covers the user creation workflow including:
- Modal opening
- Form filling
- Form submission
- Success case handling
Consider adding assertions for the state of the form after successful submission.
Add assertions to verify form reset:
await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId('firstNameInput')).toHaveValue(''); expect(screen.getByTestId('lastNameInput')).toHaveValue(''); expect(screen.getByTestId('emailInput')).toHaveValue(''); expect(screen.getByTestId('passwordInput')).toHaveValue(''); });
1929-2035: Well-structured modal interaction tests.The tests cover important modal behaviors:
- Opening and closing
- Escape key handling
- Form interaction
- State persistence
Consider adding a test for clicking outside the modal to close.
Add test for clicking outside modal:
test('modal closes when clicking outside', async () => { // ... setup code ... const modalBackdrop = screen.getByTestId('modal-backdrop'); userEvent.click(modalBackdrop); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.queryByTestId('addNewUserModal')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); }); });
2152-2201: Improve error handling test assertions.While the test covers the error case, it could be more specific in its assertions.
Add more specific error handling assertions:
await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Failed to add member'); expect(screen.getByTestId('addNewUserModal')).toBeInTheDocument(); // Modal should stay open expect(screen.getByTestId('firstNameInput')).toHaveValue('John'); // Form should retain values });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx (3)
31-37: LGTM! Clean mock setup for toast notifications.The mock setup for react-toastify is well-structured and includes all necessary toast methods (error, info, success).
956-1028: Comprehensive error handling test coverage.Good test coverage for signup error scenarios including:
- Network errors
- Null user ID handling
- Form state persistence after error
The test maintains good isolation by using specific error mocks.
702-705: Duplicate beforeEach hook detected.This beforeEach hook appears to be duplicated in the test suite. Consider consolidating duplicate hooks.
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3133 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 21.89% 89.64% +67.74%
=====================================================
Files 301 322 +21
Lines 7685 8451 +766
Branches 1678 1841 +163
=====================================================
+ Hits 1683 7576 +5893
+ Misses 5896 646 -5250
- Partials 106 229 +123 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (1)
Line range hint
196-202: Enhance password validation and error messagingThe current password validation only checks if passwords match. Consider adding:
- Password strength requirements (length, special characters, etc.)
- More specific error messages indicating password requirements
- Rate limiting for failed attempts
This would improve security and user experience.
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx (4)
1719-1747: Toast error check for member query
Verifyingtoast.erroris recommended. Consider also asserting any changes in component UI state to confirm a proper error boundary.
1748-1804: Toast error check for admin query
Same pattern as the member error test. Optional: add an assertion on whether UI flows degrade gracefully beyond just error toast calls.
1805-1863: Toast error check for user query
This test is consistent with the others for verifying toast usage. Extending UI-state checks would further improve coverage.
2071-2139: GraphQL error handling
Reinforces that error conditions prompt immediate toast feedback. Possibly add UI checks if relevant.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx(6 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (18)
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (1)
389-389: LGTM! Improved testability and simplified image handlingThe changes enhance test coverage with the new
data-testidattribute and simplify the image source assignment while maintaining safety through conditional rendering.Also applies to: 444-447
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.spec.tsx (17)
3-3: Imports look good
The test setup imports are appropriate and commonly used.
25-25: Toast import check
Importingtoastis consistent with its usage in this test file.
31-37: Mockingreact-toastify
These mocks clearly definetoast.error,toast.info, andtoast.success. This is a suitable approach for isolating external dependencies in tests.
645-648: Error constants
Storing error objects at the top of the relevant describe block improves readability and reuse.
649-666:successfulMemberResponsetest mock
This encapsulated mock object is well-structured and clear. No issues found.
668-685:successfulAdminResponsetest mock
This mock aligns well with the admin query scenario. Looks good.
687-700:successfulUserResponsetest mock
The user query mock is comprehensive and consistent with the app’s needs.
702-705:beforeEachtest hook
Preparing mocks and clearing them before each test is a good practice. No duplicate hooks remain.
856-867:mockSignupResponse2
Good separation of mock responses to handle different test cases.
868-901:mockCreateMemberResponse2anddefaultMocks2
Defining separate mocks for sign-up and member creation keeps tests flexible and maintainable.
903-951:successfully creates user and adds them as membertest
The test thoroughly checks the user creation flow. Looks solid.
953-1021:handles signup error gracefullytest
Verifying error toast is a good approach to ensure error feedback is visible to users.
1023-1096:handles null createdUserId gracefullytest
Returningnullin GraphQL responses can be tricky. The test ensures robust error handling.
1917-1953: Opening add user modal
The test succinctly checks modal rendering and closure. Well done.
1954-2023: Modal state management
Comprehensive coverage of open, close, toggle, and escape-press scenarios. This is thorough.
2025-2070: Testing toast errors
Ensures error toast is triggered without valid inputs – good negative test coverage.
2140-2189:createMembererror test
Confirmingtoast.errorcall and avoiding partial state changes is well-executed.
disha1202
merged commit 1f2379b
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Improved code coverage in src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx
Improved code coverage in src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx
Issue Number:
Fixes #3030
Did you add tests for your changes?
yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests