Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improved code coverage of src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx #3137

Conversation

PrajwalLokhande2003
Copy link

@PrajwalLokhande2003 PrajwalLokhande2003 commented Jan 4, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Improve Code Coverage in src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx

Issue Number:

Fixes #3040

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Snapshots/Videos:

screen.mp4

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

N/A

Summary

This PR improves code coverage for the Organization component by:

  • Adding test cases for previously uncovered code paths
  • Removing unnecessary istanbul ignore statements
  • Ensuring 100% test coverage of the component

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Other information

Code coverage increased from previous coverage to 100% for the specified component.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Dependency Updates

    • Updated Jest version to 27.5.1
    • Reorganized dependencies and type definitions for chart.js and react-chartjs-2
  • UI Adjustments

    • Minor rendering optimization in Organizations component by removing unnecessary whitespace

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.24%. Comparing base (3d1f1f0) to head (1aed401).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3137      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.26%   98.24%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         297      297              
  Lines        8638     8638              
  Branches     2514     2515       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         8488     8486       -2     
- Misses        139      141       +2     
  Partials       11       11              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves minor modifications to the package.json file and a small rendering change in the Organizations.tsx component. The changes in package.json include updating the Jest version, and reorganizing dependencies like chart.js and @types/react-chartjs-2. In the Organizations.tsx file, a minor rendering adjustment was made by replacing a space character with an empty string.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json - Updated Jest version from ^27.4.5 to ^27.5.1
- Reorganized dependencies: chart.js and @types/react-chartjs-2 removed and re-added
src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx Replaced {' '} with {''} in rendering logic

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve Code Coverage [#3040] Minimal changes do not directly address comprehensive code coverage improvement
Create/Update Test Cases [#3040] No new test cases were added for the Organizations component
Remove Coverage Bypass Statements [#3040] No coverage ignore statements were removed

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • disha1202
  • noman2002

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Dependency Dance

Packages shuffling, versions light,
Jest bumps up with coding might,
A space replaced, so subtle and neat,
CodeRabbit's changes make the PR sweet!

Hop, hop, hooray! 🎉


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d1f1f0 and 1aed401.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (3 hunks)
  • src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx
  • package.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 4, 2025
@palisadoes palisadoes changed the base branch from main to develop-postgres January 4, 2025 18:22
@palisadoes palisadoes dismissed coderabbitai[bot]’s stale review January 4, 2025 18:22

The base branch was changed.

@palisadoes palisadoes self-requested a review as a code owner January 4, 2025 18:22
@palisadoes palisadoes changed the base branch from develop-postgres to main January 4, 2025 18:22
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please submit your PRs against our develop-postgres branch. This is a temporary requirement as we prepare to migrate our API backend to Postgres.

Also if applicable, make sure your branch name is different from develop-postgres when resubmitting.

Closing.

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve Code Coverage in src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx
2 participants