Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for issue #1189 --->PFH buffer, adds to key list even is key was found #1243

Closed

Conversation

strothmw
Copy link
Contributor

Fix for issue #1189; replacement of PR #1191 but only fixes a single issue

…uest that only fixes 1189

Resolved conflict induced by automatic git revert

Revert "fixed wrong erasing order on feature_map_ in PFHEstimation"

This reverts commit bbec109.

Conflicts:
	features/include/pcl/features/impl/pfh.hpp
@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho added the needs: code review Specify why not closed/merged yet label Jul 14, 2016
@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho added this to the pcl-1.8.1 milestone Jul 14, 2016
@SergioRAgostinho
Copy link
Member

👍 This LGTM. Can you squash it please and then we should be good to go.

@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho added needs: author reply Specify why not closed/merged yet and removed needs: code review Specify why not closed/merged yet labels Aug 18, 2016
SergioRAgostinho pushed a commit to SergioRAgostinho/pcl that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2016
SergioRAgostinho pushed a commit to SergioRAgostinho/pcl that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2016
@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho removed the needs: author reply Specify why not closed/merged yet label Aug 26, 2016
@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho removed this from the pcl-1.8.1 milestone Aug 26, 2016
SergioRAgostinho pushed a commit to SergioRAgostinho/pcl that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2016
SergioRAgostinho pushed a commit to SergioRAgostinho/pcl that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants