Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Diggy Experimental (foundation for multi surface diggy) #950

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SimonFlapse
Copy link
Member

Based off Dark Forest by Bienenstock

Changes to Diggy, allowing other entities than rocks.

image

@theorangeangle
Copy link
Member

Do you want to beta test this sometime? Or just throw in the scenario/run publicly

@SimonFlapse
Copy link
Member Author

SimonFlapse commented Jul 6, 2019

We can do a public run, and merge if it goes well.

I'm still a bit conflicted regarding how to keep diggy and diggy experimental updated with minimal manual work. Right now i'm referencing all diggy files from diggy experimental, and replacing the scripts that has changed for diggy experimental.

@theorangeangle
Copy link
Member

@grilledham should we implement different “modes” for Diggy in the same way it was done for crash site?

Sent with GitHawk

@theorangeangle theorangeangle added Diggy The Diggy scenario Needs testing labels Sep 1, 2019
@grilledham
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't really know the Diggy code very well, so I don't know how easy it would be. But multiple modes / presets for Diggy would make the most sense to me.
We could even add it as a scenario on the web panel, like there is for the two crashsite variants.

@theorangeangle
Copy link
Member

I'm going to start testing on thursday in an effort to clear out some of the old PRs and add maps to the scenario.

@BlueRock2
Copy link
Contributor

BlueRock2 commented Feb 13, 2020

Hello I am very curious about this diggy version. Does it completely do away with the ceiling support system? Or are there separate indoor/outdoor areas? I would be happy to help test or give feedback.

@SimonFlapse
Copy link
Member Author

@BlueRock2 The current state of it has ceiling support disabled. But I don't see why it couldn't be supported. The PR is stale though, due to lack of time on my end. My vision is to use this for a multi surface Diggy. Where this would be the overworld, and the classic diggy as the underground.

@BlueRock2
Copy link
Contributor

Oh how I wish trains could travel between surfaces... Would love to have indoor and outdoor areas in diggy. Other than just supports and scenery could do some interesting things to change up the rules by being indoors vs. outdoors.

@SimonFlapse
Copy link
Member Author

I'm not sure, but you could mix together some logic to copy a train and its contents between surfaces. You just need to figure out where the cave entrance would be. (Maybe limited map size in a single direction/part of the map kept as void. Do you could like around it)

@theorangeangle theorangeangle changed the title [WIP] Diggy Experimental [WIP] Diggy Experimental (foundation for multi surface diggy) Mar 31, 2020
@SimonFlapse SimonFlapse marked this pull request as draft April 29, 2020 20:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Diggy The Diggy scenario Needs testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants