Issueid #0000 iframe height for fill in the blanks

[ajinkyapandetekdi]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Improved audio playback handling within the Practice component.
  • Enhanced rendering for different game mechanics, including "fillInTheBlank" and "formAWord."

• Bug Fixes

  • Refined logic for transitioning between questions and managing game state, including lives data.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Practice.jsx component, focusing on audio playback handling and game mechanics management. It alters the logic for string length determination based on mechanics data, updates the renderMechanics function to better handle various mechanics types, and refines the handleNext function for transitioning between questions. These changes enhance the component's control flow and improve the accuracy of game state management.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/views/Practice/Practice.jsx	- Updated string length determination logic based on mechanics data. - Enhanced renderMechanics function to handle different mechanics types with detailed rendering logic. - Refined handleNext function for better question completion processing and game state management.

Possibly related PRs

• Issueid #228824 Api integration of Fill in the blanks Mechanics #171: This PR modifies the Practice.jsx component to integrate new mechanics and updates the rendering logic for audio and fill-in-the-blank exercises, which aligns with the changes made in the main PR regarding audio handling and mechanics rendering.
• Issue #229206 feat: For fill in the blanks mechanic,answer option sho… #187: This PR focuses on the fill-in-the-blanks mechanic, enhancing how answer options are displayed, which is directly related to the updates in the renderMechanics function in the main PR that deals with different mechanics types.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b2d0cb and 5ef2315.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/views/Practice/Practice.jsx (1 hunks)

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure safe access to mechanics_data to prevent potential errors

The condition accesses questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data[0]?.mechanics_id without verifying that mechanics_data exists. This could lead to a TypeError if mechanics_data is undefined or null. Please add a null check before accessing mechanics_data[0] to ensure safe operation.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-              (questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data &&
-                questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data[0]?.mechanics_id ===
-                  "mechanic_2") ||
-              questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data[0]?.mechanics_id ===
-                "mechanic_1"
+              (questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data &&
+                (questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data[0]?.mechanics_id ===
+                  "mechanic_2" ||
+                  questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data[0]?.mechanics_id ===
+                  "mechanic_1"))

This adjustment ensures that mechanics_data is present before accessing mechanics_data[0], preventing potential runtime errors.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	(questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data &&
	questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data[0]?.mechanics_id ===
	"mechanic_2") ||
	questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data[0]?.mechanics_id ===
	"mechanic_2"
	"mechanic_1"
	? 500
	: stringLengths[0];
	(questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data &&
	(questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data[0]?.mechanics_id ===
	"mechanic_2" ||
	questions[currentQuestion]?.mechanics_data[0]?.mechanics_id ===
	"mechanic_1"))
	? 500
	: stringLengths[0];