Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature(storage): config conversion to JSON #1670

Merged

Conversation

joseivanlopez
Copy link
Contributor

@joseivanlopez joseivanlopez commented Oct 14, 2024

Add conversion of storage config to JSON format.

This will be needed for reporting the "solved" config once the guided proposal is replaced by the agama proposal.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 14, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11367973983

Details

  • 330 of 358 (92.18%) changed or added relevant lines in 23 files are covered.
  • 3 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.6%) to 71.715%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
service/lib/agama/storage/config_conversions.rb 0 1 0.0%
service/lib/agama/storage/config_conversions/to_json_conversions/base.rb 19 21 90.48%
service/lib/agama/storage/config_conversions/to_json_conversions/volume_group.rb 25 28 89.29%
service/lib/agama/storage/config_conversions/to_json_conversions.rb 0 22 0.0%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
service/service/lib/agama/storage/config_conversions.rb 3 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11364775644: 0.6%
Covered Lines: 16754
Relevant Lines: 23362

💛 - Coveralls

@joseivanlopez joseivanlopez force-pushed the storage-config-to-json branch 5 times, most recently from cbe8fb7 to b3e4bcf Compare October 16, 2024 14:33
@joseivanlopez joseivanlopez force-pushed the storage-config-to-json branch from 6f4fbd8 to 12fb25d Compare October 17, 2024 10:26
@joseivanlopez joseivanlopez marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 10:46
# @see Base#conversions
def conversions
method = config.method

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we have support for the method tpm_fde?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@joseivanlopez joseivanlopez Oct 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not yet. It is not supported in the schema neither. The read_only property for Btrfs is another missing property. If you don't mind, I will add them in a separate PR. We have to support them when importing and exporting to JSON.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. Let's approve this then to move on.

Copy link
Contributor

@ancorgs ancorgs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It generally looks good. But I miss one encryption method that I think should be supported (it is supported at the current storage UI).

Copy link
Contributor

@ancorgs ancorgs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@joseivanlopez joseivanlopez merged commit ac56617 into agama-project:master Oct 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@imobachgs imobachgs mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2025
imobachgs added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
Update to release version 11.

* #1495
* #1564
* #1617
* #1618
* #1625
* #1626
* #1627
* #1628
* #1630
* #1631
* #1632
* #1633
* #1634
* #1635
* #1636
* #1639
* #1640
* #1641
* #1642
* #1643
* #1644
* #1645
* #1646
* #1647
* #1648
* #1649
* #1650
* #1651
* #1652
* #1654
* #1655
* #1656
* #1657
* #1660
* #1663
* #1666
* #1667
* #1668
* #1670
* #1671
* #1673
* #1674
* #1675
* #1676
* #1677
* #1681
* #1682
* #1683
* #1684
* #1687
* #1688
* #1689
* #1690
* #1691
* #1692
* #1693
* #1694
* #1695
* #1696
* #1698
* #1699
* #1702
* #1703
* #1704
* #1705
* #1707
* #1708
* #1709
* #1710
* #1711
* #1712
* #1713
* #1714
* #1715
* #1716
* #1717
* #1718
* #1720
* #1721
* #1722
* #1723
* #1727
* #1728
* #1729
* #1731
* #1732
* #1733
* #1734
* #1735
* #1736
* #1737
* #1740
* #1741
* #1743
* #1744
* #1745
* #1746
* #1751
* #1753
* #1754
* #1755
* #1757
* #1762
* #1763
* #1764
* #1765
* #1766
* #1767
* #1769
* #1771
* #1772
* #1773
* #1774
* #1777
* #1778
* #1785
* #1786
* #1787
* #1788
* #1789
* #1790
* #1791
* #1792
* #1793
* #1794
* #1795
* #1796
* #1797
* #1798
* #1799
* #1800
* #1802
* #1803
* #1804
* #1805
* #1807
* #1808
* #1809
* #1810
* #1811
* #1812
* #1814
* #1815
* #1821
* #1822
* #1823
* #1824
* #1825
* #1826
* #1827
* #1828
* #1830
* #1831
* #1832
* #1833
* #1834
* #1835
* #1836
* #1837
* #1838
* #1839
* #1840
* #1841
* #1842
* #1843
* #1844
* #1845
* #1847
* #1848
* #1849
* #1850
* #1851
* #1854
* #1855
* #1856
* #1857
* #1860
* #1861
* #1863
* #1864
* #1865
* #1866
* #1867
* #1871
* #1872
* #1873
* #1875
* #1876
* #1877
* #1878
* #1880
* #1881
* #1882
* #1883
* #1884
* #1885
* #1886
* #1888
* #1889
* #1890
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants