Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

retrieve stats for provided emails #4120

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2024
Merged

retrieve stats for provided emails #4120

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

Baalmart
Copy link
Contributor

@Baalmart Baalmart commented Dec 27, 2024

Description

retrieve stats for provided emails

Changes Made

  • Introduced a new endpoint for just retrieving user stats.

Testing

  • Tested locally
  • Tested against staging environment
  • Relevant tests passed: [List test names]

Affected Services

  • Which services were modified:
    • Auth Service

Endpoints Ready for Testing

  • New endpoints ready for testing:
    • Retrieve User Analytics

API Documentation Updated?

  • Yes, API documentation was updated
  • No, API documentation does not need updating

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new /retrieve route for handling user statistics requests.
    • Added a fetchUserStats method for retrieving user statistics.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced email validation in the existing /send route.
    • Updated the route for retrieving user statistics from /analytics to /user-stats.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Standardized error handling across methods for consistent responses.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces enhancements to the analytics and user statistics functionality across multiple files in the auth-service. The changes include adding a new method for fetching user statistics, modifying route definitions, and standardizing error handling. The modifications focus on improving the retrieval and processing of user-related analytics data, with careful attention to input validation and consistent error management.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/auth-service/controllers/create-analytics.js - Added fetchUserStats method
- Modified error logging message in send method
src/auth-service/routes/v2/analytics.js - Added /retrieve POST route
- Enhanced email validation for /send route
src/auth-service/routes/v2/users.js - Renamed /analytics route to /user-stats

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    Client->>+Analytics Route: POST /retrieve
    Analytics Route->>+Validation Middleware: Validate input
    Validation Middleware-->>-Analytics Route: Validation passed
    Analytics Route->>+Analytics Controller: fetchUserStats()
    Analytics Controller->>+User Stats Service: Retrieve statistics
    User Stats Service-->>-Analytics Controller: Return user stats
    Analytics Controller-->>-Analytics Route: Send response
    Analytics Route-->>-Client: Return user statistics
Loading

Possibly Related PRs

Poem

🔍 Analytics dance, routes rearrange,
Emails validated, stats within range,
User insights now clear and bright,
Code refactored with careful might,
A symphony of data's delight! 📊✨

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.87%. Comparing base (e5c9677) to head (8652e25).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #4120   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    11.87%   11.87%           
========================================
  Files          117      117           
  Lines        15566    15566           
  Branches       321      321           
========================================
  Hits          1848     1848           
  Misses       13718    13718           

Copy link
Contributor

Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/auth-service/routes/v2/analytics.js (1)

23-36: Consider adding request schema validation for optional fields.

You introduced a new endpoint /retrieve that validates the presence of emails. If the request supports additional optional fields (e.g., year), ensure consistent validation for those fields as well. This helps maintain robust data integrity and consistent error handling.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e5c9677 and 8652e25.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/auth-service/controllers/create-analytics.js (1 hunks)
  • src/auth-service/routes/v2/analytics.js (1 hunks)
  • src/auth-service/routes/v2/users.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/auth-service/routes/v2/users.js
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/auth-service/routes/v2/analytics.js (1)

17-19: Validation for non-empty emails array looks good.

Ensuring that emails is not empty strengthens data validation and avoids processing empty arrays.

src/auth-service/controllers/create-analytics.js (2)

43-52: Revised error log message is more descriptive.

Using a more concise and descriptive error message helps with log readability and maintains consistency with the rest of the codebase.


53-88: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Ensure year parameter is properly validated for user stats retrieval.

The new fetchUserStats method uses year from the query but does not explicitly validate it. Consider adding validation or a default value to avoid unexpected behaviors (e.g., unintentional year omission).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant