Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

just restarting the micro and optimising analytics funcs #4132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

Baalmart
Copy link
Contributor

@Baalmart Baalmart commented Dec 28, 2024

Description

just restarting the micro and optimising analytics funcs

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced user statistics retrieval with more granular time-based filtering
    • Added support for processing user data in configurable chunks
    • Improved user engagement metrics calculation
  • Performance

    • Optimized data aggregation pipeline for more efficient processing

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the fetchUserStats function in the authentication service's analytics utility. The changes introduce two new parameters, chunkSize and timeWindowDays, which enable more granular processing of user statistics. The function now processes user emails in chunks and across specified time windows, allowing for more detailed and flexible user engagement analysis. The aggregation pipeline has been restructured to support this more nuanced approach to collecting and merging user activity data.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/auth-service/utils/create-analytics.js - Updated fetchUserStats method signature with new parameters chunkSize and timeWindowDays
- Implemented chunked processing of user emails
- Modified aggregation pipeline to support time-windowed analysis
- Enhanced user engagement metric calculations

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant FetchUserStats
    participant Database
    
    User->>FetchUserStats: Request user stats
    FetchUserStats->>FetchUserStats: Prepare chunk processing
    loop Time Windows
        FetchUserStats->>Database: Query user logs
        Database-->>FetchUserStats: Return log chunks
        FetchUserStats->>FetchUserStats: Aggregate metrics
    end
    FetchUserStats-->>User: Return enriched user statistics
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🔍 Chunks of data, time windows wide,
Analytics dance, metrics now glide
Emails parsed with newfound grace
Insights bloom at steady pace
Code's symphony, a statistical ride! 📊


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.87%. Comparing base (4f719f6) to head (b5a4392).
Report is 10 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #4132   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    11.87%   11.87%           
========================================
  Files          117      117           
  Lines        15566    15566           
  Branches       321      321           
========================================
  Hits          1848     1848           
  Misses       13718    13718           

Copy link
Contributor

Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/auth-service/utils/create-analytics.js (3)

770-771: Consider validating these new parameters to ensure positive values.

Currently, the function relies on default values for chunkSize and timeWindowDays. Adding a quick check for non-positive values would improve resilience and avoid potential endless loops or zero-day windows.


800-831: Optimize repeated aggregation pipeline logic.

The pipeline is well-structured, but it’s defined in a loop for each time window. You could potentially define it once, then only update the $match conditions dynamically. This might simplify the code and improve readability.


925-928: Consider a more dynamic delay.

A static 1-second delay between chunks is straightforward but might still overburden the server if chunks are large. You could adaptively adjust the wait duration based on server throughput or use a queue mechanism for more robust load control.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f553427 and b5a4392.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/auth-service/utils/create-analytics.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/auth-service/utils/create-analytics.js (4)

782-798: Double-check edge cases in the time window generation loop.

The while-loop correctly splits the year into windows of timeWindowDays, but if startDate and endDate are set to the same day or reversed, the loop might not behave as intended. Consider verifying or adjusting dates before the loop to avoid unintended behavior.


837-882: Confirm merging logic correctness.

Merging stats from multiple time windows is a good approach, but ensure that overlapping windows or partial data do not inflate totalCount or shift activity boundaries incorrectly. Additional checks could protect against edge overlaps.


886-886: Good decision to skip zero-activity users.

Skipping users with totalCount === 0 prevents clutter in the final stats array and omits unnecessary processing.


888-922: Final stats structure looks comprehensive and well-organized.

The final user objects include meaningful metrics (e.g., engagement score, top services, and activity duration). This design helps deliver actionable insights.

@Baalmart Baalmart merged commit b5d47f1 into staging Dec 28, 2024
52 checks passed
@Baalmart Baalmart deleted the hf-user-stats branch December 28, 2024 22:47
@Baalmart Baalmart mentioned this pull request Dec 28, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant