Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(material-experimental): unit tests getting wrong root element and add API for getting property value #16706

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2019

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto commented Aug 7, 2019

Based on the discussion in #16697 (comment), these changes fix a couple of things that I ran into while doing the mat-autocomplete test harness in #16620.

  • Fixes querying for elements outside the harness not working, because the wrong root node was set.
  • Adds an API to retrieve the value of a property on a DOM node.

Note: marking as P2, because the issue with the root node is something that'll come up every time we write a harness for an overlay-based component.

@crisbeto crisbeto added P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround pr: merge safe labels Aug 7, 2019
@crisbeto crisbeto requested a review from mmalerba as a code owner August 7, 2019 05:20
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Aug 7, 2019
Copy link
Member

@devversion devversion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The propertyValue method is similar to what I did in the input harness (ae96075) but it's better to have it in a separate PR. LGTM

@devversion devversion added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Aug 7, 2019
@ngbot

This comment has been minimized.

@crisbeto crisbeto force-pushed the harness-misc-fixes branch 2 times, most recently from 7889ec7 to 06b0d0a Compare August 7, 2019 07:32
@mmalerba mmalerba removed the action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker label Aug 12, 2019
@mmalerba
Copy link
Contributor

re-apply merge ready after comments are resolved

@jelbourn
Copy link
Member

Commenting here for posterity: decided in the team meeting to do separate methods for attributes and properties with no fallbacks

@crisbeto crisbeto force-pushed the harness-misc-fixes branch 4 times, most recently from 2c2757f to 8dd52a8 Compare August 22, 2019 18:25
@crisbeto crisbeto force-pushed the harness-misc-fixes branch 2 times, most recently from 0cb3c82 to b12ed29 Compare August 22, 2019 18:38
… add API for getting property value

Based on the discussion in angular#16697 (comment), these changes fix a couple of things that I ran into while doing the `mat-autocomplete` test harness in angular#16620.

* Fixes querying for elements outside the harness not working, because the wrong root node was set.
* Adds an API to retrieve the value of a property on a DOM node.
@crisbeto crisbeto force-pushed the harness-misc-fixes branch from b12ed29 to adb5881 Compare August 22, 2019 18:48
@crisbeto
Copy link
Member Author

@mmalerba all the feedback has been addressed.

@mmalerba mmalerba added the action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker label Aug 22, 2019
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants