-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 847
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix flaky test test_fuzz_async_reader_selection
#2656
Conversation
@tustvold FYI. This should fix the flaky test. |
@@ -1015,7 +1014,7 @@ mod tests { | |||
let mut selectors = vec![]; | |||
|
|||
while total_rows < 7300 { | |||
let row_count: usize = rand.gen_range(0..100); | |||
let row_count: usize = rand.gen_range(1..100); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So RowSelector.row_count
cannot be 0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It can if you manually construct one as we do in this test but in practice it would be non-sensical (and you wouldn't ever get one if you built a RowSelection
from ranges or BooleanArray
s). So depending on your perspective we could consider this a bug in the ParquetRecordBatchReader
(probably, not sure where the actual issue comes up) but I think if we did the solution would be to just disallow row counts of 0 explicitly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps you could file a ticket describing the issue, I agree it isn't urgent but it should probably be looked into eventually (as it might unveil other issues).
Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 31aaef2 and contender = a37c038. a37c038 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes. |
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
Rationale for this change
Fixes flaky fuzz test for row selection. Was generating random row selections with
row_count
equal to 0 which mucks things up.What changes are included in this PR?
Are there any user-facing changes?