Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-18617][BACKPORT] Follow up PR to Close "kryo auto pick" feature for Spark Streaming #16096

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

uncleGen
Copy link
Contributor

@uncleGen uncleGen commented Dec 1, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up PR to backport #16052 to branch-2.0 with incremental update in #16091

How was this patch tested?

new unit test

cc @zsxwing @rxin

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Dec 1, 2016

Can you use a meaningful title & description instead of saying backport? This is important because it becomes part of the commit history.

You can put the backport message in the body. Thanks.

@uncleGen uncleGen changed the title [SPARK-18617][BACKPORT] backport to branch-2.0 [SPARK-18617][BACKPORT] Follow up PR to Close "kryo auto pick" feature for Spark Streaming Dec 1, 2016
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 1, 2016

Test build #69455 has finished for PR 16096 at commit 76e0143.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Dec 1, 2016

Merging in. Can you close the pull request? It won't auto close because it's not merged in master.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2016
…e for Spark Streaming

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up PR to backport #16052 to branch-2.0 with incremental update in #16091

## How was this patch tested?

new unit test

cc zsxwing rxin

Author: uncleGen <[email protected]>

Closes #16096 from uncleGen/branch-2.0-SPARK-18617.
@uncleGen uncleGen closed this Dec 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants