Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-34520][CORE][FOLLOW-UP] Remove SecurityManager in GangliaSink #31688

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a followup of #31636. There was one place missed in GangliaSink, and we should also remove SecurityManager.

Why are the changes needed?

To make GangliaSink work.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

It was found in the internal it tests in the company I work for.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

cc @dongjoon-hyun, mind taking a quick look please? I wonder how I missed this.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @maropu.

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 1, 2021

Test build #135570 has finished for PR 31688 at commit b19a2da.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
  • class GangliaSink(

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Merged to master.

Thanks @maropu and @dongjoon-hyun.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 1, 2021

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/40151/

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 1, 2021

Kubernetes integration test status success
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/40151/

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon deleted the SPARK-34520-followup branch January 4, 2022 00:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants