[SPARK-50507][PYTHON][TESTS] Group pandas function related tests #49074
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dongjoon-hyun
requested changes
Dec 5, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need a JIRA issue for this, @zhengruifeng . :)
+1 for the code.
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2024
zhengruifeng
changed the title
|
@dongjoon-hyun thanks, add the JIRA number |
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1, LGTM. Thank you, @zhengruifeng and @HyukjinKwon .
Merged to master for Apache Spark 4.0.0 on February 2025.
HyukjinKwon
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2024
…ure Python test ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR is a followup of #49074 that adds refactored package into pure Python test ### Why are the changes needed? In order to fix the pure Python build https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/12215379954/job/34077255570. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, test-only. ### How was this patch tested? Will monitor the build. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #49106 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-50507-followup. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
a0x8o
added a commit
to a0x8o/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2024
…ure Python test ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR is a followup of apache/spark#49074 that adds refactored package into pure Python test ### Why are the changes needed? In order to fix the pure Python build https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/12215379954/job/34077255570. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, test-only. ### How was this patch tested? Will monitor the build. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #49106 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-50507-followup. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
HyukjinKwon
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2024
…ure Python test ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR is a followup of #49074 that adds refactored package into pure Python test ### Why are the changes needed? In order to fix the pure Python build https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/12215379954/job/34077255570. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, test-only. ### How was this patch tested? Will monitor the build. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #49119 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-50507-followup2. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Group pandas function related tests
Why are the changes needed?
these tests were grouped in classic side, also group the parity tests for consistency
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no, test-only
How was this patch tested?
updated ci
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
no