Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix invalid command should not show terraform help #889

Conversation

samtholiya
Copy link
Collaborator

@samtholiya samtholiya commented Dec 24, 2024

issue: https://linear.app/cloudposse/issue/DEV-2894/atmos-terraform-asdfasdf-should-show-error-message-instead-of-help

what

why

  • Currently if customer executes invalid command we get the following help screen:
    image
    This was not consistent with
    image

references

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error handling for the terraformCmd command, providing clearer feedback for command usage.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved consistency in command execution return values to ensure proper error reporting.

@samtholiya samtholiya requested a review from a team as a code owner December 24, 2024 11:11
@mergify mergify bot added the triage Needs triage label Dec 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the terraformCmd in cmd/terraform.go to improve error handling and command execution. The primary change involves transitioning from Run to RunE, which enables more robust error reporting. When an unknown subcommand is provided, the function now prints a specific error message and returns an error, enhancing user feedback during Terraform command interactions.

Changes

File Change Summary
cmd/terraform.go - Updated method signature from Run to RunE
- Added explicit error handling for unknown subcommands
- Standardized return statements to consistently return nil or an error

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Show error for invalid Terraform subcommands [DEV-2894]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

patch

Suggested reviewers

  • hans-d
  • aknysh
  • johncblandii

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or @auto-summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @auto-title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cmd/terraform.go (1)

41-41: Correct the spelling of “Unknkown”.

It should be spelled “Unknown” in both the error message and printed string.

- fmt.Printf(`Error: Unknkown command %q for %q`+"\n", args[0], cmd.CommandPath())
+ fmt.Printf(`Error: Unknown command %q for %q`+"\n", args[0], cmd.CommandPath())
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a27442 and 50d09a6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cmd/terraform.go (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cmd/terraform.go (2)

21-21: Good change to RunE.

Switching from Run to RunE allows for better error handling. This aligns with the PR’s objective to provide a clearer error message and more robust reporting.


56-56: Consistent return ensures proper run lifecycle.

Using return nil here complies with the RunE signature, signaling successful execution and preventing help output for invalid commands.

@mergify mergify bot removed the triage Needs triage label Dec 24, 2024
@osterman
Copy link
Member

@samtholiya
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Won't this depend on:

I realized it later why bother having multiple pr for the same issue. Closing this. (#857) will include this. But ofcourse the #857 is already having multiple fixes by now.

@samtholiya samtholiya closed this Dec 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants